poliphilo: (Default)
poliphilo ([personal profile] poliphilo) wrote2004-11-13 08:47 am
Entry tags:

Fatherhood

What's with this this father-son thing that Hollywood keeps shoving
at us?

Spielberg can't leave it alone. Catch Me If You Can was sharp and funny so long as Leo was sticking it to the Man, but then we found out that his delinquency was down to the lack of a father figure and all it needed to reform him was for Tom Hanks to offer him unquestioning love.

Yesterday I was watching Finding Nemo. Great film in its way, but Albert Brooks's fussy lttle everyman of a soccer-dad made me feel queasy. If Ellen DeGeneres hadn't happened along I might well have walked out.

It's like the nineteenth century cult of motherhood. It gives off a sickly smell. I think there's something rotten that's being covered up.

Actually, I know perfectly well what it is. A very high proportion of dads who walk out of a marriage lose contact with their kids within two or three years. And a high proportion of those who stay behind are bullies, brutes and abusers. Of course there are good dads, but there are an awful lot of absolute shites as well.

Do families need fathers?

We daren't say "no" because if we did it would hurt the feelings of men. And that would be tricky because it's men who run the world. So we tell ourselves these cute little stories to keep ourselves from thinking too much about the facts.

There was once a little fishy and his wife got eaten by a barracuda so he had to look after his baby son all by himself and he loved his little son so much that he got a weeny bit over-protective; and then one fine day...

[identity profile] sorenr.livejournal.com 2004-11-13 10:04 am (UTC)(link)
I don't reckon father's are indispensible, just as I think a child can be perfectly happy without a mother. (Well; apart from the trauma that society imagines the child to have over this, which eventually becomes real to the child...)

I think a rolemodel of each gender is preferable to have, but I've seen plenty of examples of these being provided by soembody who happens to have had nothing whatsoever to do with the actual conception of the child...

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com 2004-11-13 10:19 am (UTC)(link)
Like you, I'm inclined to think that children react to adult hysteria and a motherless/fatherless child suffers less from the actual absence than from the fluffing around of concerned adults - "o, you poor little thing!"

[identity profile] jackiejj.livejournal.com 2004-11-13 12:22 pm (UTC)(link)
The hardest part for the children wasn't the lack of support or the lack of their father's presence. It was the moment of truth when they realized he didn't love them.

That was tough. The rest was easy by comparison.

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com 2004-11-13 12:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Here's another part of the equation.

My first wife and I split up when the kids were still small. Staying in touch with them over those years of childhood and adolescence was the most demanding, practically difficult and emotionally wrenching thing I have ever done.

[identity profile] jackiejj.livejournal.com 2004-11-13 01:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Staying in touch with them over those years of childhood and adolescence was the most demanding, practically difficult and emotionally wrenching thing I have ever done.

I'm sure it must have been very hard for you, but you did it, and you did it for them. Now that they are grown, they can understand and appreciate the effort you made to forge a relationship and offer your support to them.

Without that great effort, there would be nothing there now, no way to have adult friendships and care, which is the great surprise and gift of later parenthood.



[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com 2004-11-13 03:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes it was worth the effort. I can only guess at how much I would hate myself if I hadn't done it.

(no subject)

[identity profile] jackiejj.livejournal.com - 2004-11-13 20:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com - 2004-11-13 23:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] jackiejj.livejournal.com - 2004-11-14 00:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com - 2004-11-14 09:45 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] jackiejj.livejournal.com - 2004-11-14 12:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com - 2004-11-14 13:31 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] jackiejj.livejournal.com - 2004-11-14 13:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com - 2004-11-13 23:48 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] jackiejj.livejournal.com - 2004-11-14 00:04 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com - 2004-11-14 09:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] jackiejj.livejournal.com - 2004-11-14 12:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] karenkay.livejournal.com - 2004-11-14 06:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com - 2004-11-14 09:59 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] karenkay.livejournal.com 2004-11-13 04:19 pm (UTC)(link)
I absolutely believe that. And I think you've exactly hit on why fathers are becoming so idealized. The ones who haven't been able to step up feel guilty, and the ones that have, well, the ones who write screenplays consider themselves saints. And they may well be.

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com 2004-11-13 05:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe we need all these films about loving fathers. Maybe us men will learn from them.

A friend of mine just said that one of the greatest things John Lennon ever did was to set an example (with Sean, not Julian) of loving fatherhood.

(no subject)

[identity profile] karenkay.livejournal.com - 2004-11-13 17:26 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com - 2004-11-13 18:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] karenkay.livejournal.com - 2004-11-13 18:12 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com - 2004-11-13 23:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] karenkay.livejournal.com - 2004-11-14 06:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] catvalente.livejournal.com - 2004-11-14 08:03 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com - 2004-11-14 10:03 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] catvalente.livejournal.com - 2004-11-14 10:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com - 2004-11-14 10:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] catvalente.livejournal.com - 2004-11-14 10:21 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com - 2004-11-14 10:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] catvalente.livejournal.com - 2004-11-14 10:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com - 2004-11-14 11:12 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] catvalente.livejournal.com - 2004-11-14 11:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com - 2004-11-14 11:24 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] catvalente.livejournal.com - 2004-11-14 11:26 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com - 2004-11-14 11:32 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] catvalente.livejournal.com - 2004-11-14 11:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com - 2004-11-14 13:05 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com 2004-11-13 12:55 pm (UTC)(link)
This is humbling.

I guess Spielberg is fixated on fathers because he comes from a broken home.

And maybe the reason I'm so down on fathers is that mine- who died a year ago yesterday- was such a distant, emotionally unreachable person.

I wote the post as if from an Olympian height of objectivity, but in fact one can never discount the personal.
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com - 2004-11-13 15:29 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] jourdannex.livejournal.com 2004-11-13 04:47 pm (UTC)(link)
I applaud you for doing what you did, making the effort of keeping in touch, because as hard as it must have been, it most likely made your children realize how much you loved them. It's very odd now in my life to have a man ring me up once every few years and pretend we have this father/daughter relationship...it's rather like having a neighbour you don't know ring you up.

I would say that families do need fathers, regardless if they live there or not, or at least a positive father figure in some way.

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com 2004-11-13 05:25 pm (UTC)(link)
You've reminded me that's it's been a week or two since I last spoke to my daughter. (I hate the telephone.) So I've just given her a call...

Thanks.

[identity profile] egilsdottir.livejournal.com 2004-11-13 06:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Do families need fathers?

i grew up with a father who possessed far more maternal/domestic instincts than my mother did. so much so, that when my parents divorced, my brother and i both lived with my father.

people are puzzled when i tell them that in addition to holding down a demanding job, my father was the one who took my brother and i to doctor and orthodontist appointments, and packed our lunches, and baked chocolate chip cookies.

to me, it's very strange (and sad) when people tell me that they hardly had any contact with their fathers at all while growing up. but then again, that's probably how people feel about me when i tell them the same about my mother.

my boyfriend, for example, has almost no memories of spending time with his father when he was a child. my boyfriend is the product of a chilean father and an american mother. his father very much fit the machismo latin stereotype of constantly working to provide for his family. occasionally, he would lose his temper and yell at my boyfriend and his brothers to sort of "keep them in line", and that was about it. his role in the family was limited to financial support and disciplinarian.

i don't even know where i'm going with this rambling, i suppose i just wanted to add my two cents to the jar. although my family is a somewhat unusual case, the effects of my background have produced a very different concept of gender roles in the family in me.

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com 2004-11-13 11:37 pm (UTC)(link)
I guess the thing is that children need parents, but the parents don't need to be two in number, they don't need to be one of either sex and they don't need to be blood relatives. What matters is that, whoever they are, they
provide the child with nurture and love and unquestioning acceptance.

[identity profile] morrison-maiden.livejournal.com 2004-11-13 06:32 pm (UTC)(link)
I think that fathers are important, but honestly, I think that some children don't have problems getting on without one. I think that in the early part of the century, it seemed that a lot of children grew up with one parent, as the result of a sudden death, or even raised by an older sibling. I think now, many people assume that fathers are totally necessary, but I don't know. My parents are still together, but my father has spent much of his time away from home. I miss him when he's away, but I don't think it really hindered my growing up :\

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com 2004-11-13 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)
My father was usually there- but living in his own, closed off little world.

That's right about the early 1900s. You read children's books of that period and the parents (if they exist at all) are well in the background and the kids (there are often lots of them) sort of bring one another up.

[identity profile] besideserato.livejournal.com 2004-11-14 05:06 am (UTC)(link)
As always incisive in your reflections!

Still a daddy's girl all the way. [Smiles]

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com 2004-11-14 10:04 am (UTC)(link)
But your daddy sounds like a whole lot of fun. I enjoyed your father-daughter trip to the supermarket.:)

[identity profile] besideserato.livejournal.com 2004-11-14 11:50 am (UTC)(link)
Daddykins and I know how to have fun every once in a while. He was, after all, the first man to make me do a tequila shot. Then again, his version of it includes a Super Soaker, so I don't know whether that was a good idea or not... [laughs]

[identity profile] ibid.livejournal.com 2004-11-14 01:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Possibly it is related to the cult of motherhood, the stern Victorian Pater familias was opposed to warm n' fuzzy Mama (for somereason I find the anachronism amusing). Now I think Men are somewhat (though not as much as they should be) more in touch with the emotional side of things and hence they realise - hey being a Dad is good!
I think you are being a bit hard on men. My own father is lovely ad I can joke and be silly in a way I can't be with Mum. when Dads get it right it is superb!

Also is it a daily mail esque reaction against working mothers?

Or is is like Baboons. In baboon groups there is an alphamale who is big and hard. Lesser males form friendships with babies and then get to know (in all senses) the mothers (Kind of Nick Hornbyish n'est c'estpas?) but by presenting that image they are getting women.

On a final rambling note I read an article in psychology today ages ago which said that many men after they have been married for a few years experience a rise in Oestrogen in their brains and a corrisponding fall in testosterone which makes them more willing to settle and remain faithful.

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com 2004-11-14 01:53 pm (UTC)(link)
I think men are in crisis.

And a lot of what is going on is about men fighting to hold on to their turf. There's a nostalgia for the fixity of the Victorian gender roles.

That's interesting about the rise in oestrogen levels in married men. And the baboons. I'm glad the feminized male baboons get to be "friendly" with the gals.

Girlie men of the world unite!

[identity profile] ibid.livejournal.com 2004-11-14 03:15 pm (UTC)(link)
they must not become too girly though or they will hog the bathroom.
Also the basic reason of why I could never be a lesbian - women willinsist on holding post mortems over their emotions! Men don't and it is so refreshing!

[identity profile] ide-cyan.livejournal.com 2004-11-17 05:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Read the Khatru (http://www.tiptree.org/catalog.html#Khatru) symposium. Then read Up the Walls of the World.

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com 2004-11-17 07:55 pm (UTC)(link)
James Tiptree Jr, eh? Ok, I will.