Gnats And Camels

[poliphilo]

Judy sent me an article about Pat Robertson's mining interests and how his charities stand to make money out of Katrina. I understand that the man's sailed pretty close to the wind in the past, mixing God's business with his own.

When I was studying the Bible the thing that really stood out for me (and made me feel extremely uncomfortable) was the bit about how hard it is for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of Heaven. I wasn't exactly rich back then, but I was comfortably middle-class and it gnawed at me that I wasn't poor enough to satisfy God. It was reading the Bible that made me a socialist (of sorts.) I didn't (and don't) see how a serious Christian can jump any other way.

You have to go through the Bible with a fine tooth-comb to find (debatable)texts condemning homosexuality, but the ones condemning the rich are lying about on the surface in plain view. The New Testament says that people who concentrate on obscure, fiddly bits of doctrine and miss the bleeding obvious, are "straining out a gnat and swallowing a camel." If Pat read the Bible as closely as he says he does he wouldn't be mining diamonds. He really wouldn't. A wealthy evangelist- it's a contradiction in terms.

Comments

[poliphilo.livejournal.com]

I agree. My head's full of New Testament quotes at the moment- and the one that comes unbidden is this- "you cannot serve God and Mammon."

Hell, the impossibility of living the spiritual life while pursuing wealth is a message that's repeated again and again in the scriptures these people regard as infallible and yet they overlook it entirely.

I'm baffled by their wilful blindness. Is Robertson a pious fool or a supremely cynical charlatan or what?

[sunfell.livejournal.com]

RE: the Pat Robertson question, I'd say "Yes" to both. Seriously. A pious charlatan. And a fool, too.

I've been working on a theory about why people are able to both practically worship the Bible and are at the same time blind to the wisdom that the revisers managed not to totally screw up. It's an inside/outside sort of thing. If you are inside a church or cult, the noise of that church or cult totally drowns out any common sense or wisdom that the scriptures might impart. So, the Bible can say over and over again, Blessed are the meek, love your neighbor, you can't worship both God and Mammon, but if the shiny leader and the shiny elders and the shiny congregants are worshipping Mammon and also taking the scripture out of context, the sheeple will follow blindly along.

However, if you have chosen to walk away from the fold, or are an independent and/or intellectual and mystical soul, you are not hemmed in and herded by the revening flock, or drowned out by its noise. You can examine the scriptures at length without peer pressure, and actually follow their wiser tenets. You can be meek, love your neighbor and walk with whatever perception of God you wish. No one will badmouth your choices, condemn your lifestyle, or pressure you to Want and Buy More Stuff.

The Scriptures don't want you to be destitute- they just want you to understand that the pursuit and accumulation of material wealth and goods is futile, and in not doing so, you can actually perceive and interact with the Holy Spirit.

[poliphilo.livejournal.com]

For most people it's about belonging. The warmth generated by the flock is enough. You're a member of God's club. Turning up on cue is what certifies you as a good person.

My experience as a Christian priest was that I was saying one thing and the people in the pews were hearing something else. Actually, now I think about it, my experience as a Wiccan High Priest was much the same. I was saying "trust your own feelings and intuitions," and they were replying, "whatever you say, Oh wise one."

[sunfell.livejournal.com]

It was what you speak of- my saying one thing and the people I was saying it to hearing something entirely different, or just nodding along without challenging me in any manner- that made me realize that I had to leave the position of HPS.

[poliphilo.livejournal.com]

Like you I have renounced that kind of power. I don't want to be anybody's priest or guru any more.

[sunfell.livejournal.com]

Have you gotten any negative feedback or have been called a 'coward' or worse for abandoning that power? I have- and the ones doing the name calling were the very ones who wanted to give me even more power. Some of them have seen the light, and now understand where I came from. Others have not. Life goes on.

I feel that my leaving ministry was a move made in strength, not in surrender or cowardice. I could see the guru trap opening beneath my feet, the diversion off the Path I was on, and I feel that I have managed to avoid it. There are two types of power: power over (that of priest/esses and ministers) and power within: that of mystics and adepts. I prefer the latter. It cannot be taken away.

[poliphilo.livejournal.com]

I got a bit of flak for leaving the Church, none for leaving my position in Wicca- but that was because it was a gradual down-scaling and withdrawal, not a sudden break.

I have come to think of gurudom as a terrible trap. The teacher gets mired down in his/her own teaching and cannot move on. Besides which, all power, even power exercised benignly, has a corrupting effect on the person who wields it.

[sunfell.livejournal.com]

My withdrawal from Wicca was also gradual, but when the charlatans came along and started wracking havoc in my community, I caught flack because I did not swan in and 'save the day'. Hell, they'd run me off- why the hell would I want to come back? Hypocritical...

[poliphilo.livejournal.com]

I withdrew from the community a good while before I finally gave up running a coven. Ailz and I were quite "famous" for a while- newspaper articles, TV appearances etc- but then it slowly tailed off.

I had realised that fame comes at a price and that if I wanted to sustain it I would have to start selling myself and wearing a mask.

And that the more I wore the mask, the less there would be behind it.

You did the right thing. The only way you could have seen off the predators was to take up the mantle you had already discarded- a retrograde step.

[poliphilo.livejournal.com]

P.S. When I say "power" I mean "power over". I appreciate your distinction between that and the power that comes from within.