Gnats And Camels
Sep. 10th, 2005 10:01 amJudy sent me an article about Pat Robertson's mining interests and how his charities stand to make money out of Katrina. I understand that the man's sailed pretty close to the wind in the past, mixing God's business with his own.
When I was studying the Bible the thing that really stood out for me (and made me feel extremely uncomfortable) was the bit about how hard it is for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of Heaven. I wasn't exactly rich back then, but I was comfortably middle-class and it gnawed at me that I wasn't poor enough to satisfy God. It was reading the Bible that made me a socialist (of sorts.) I didn't (and don't) see how a serious Christian can jump any other way.
You have to go through the Bible with a fine tooth-comb to find (debatable)texts condemning homosexuality, but the ones condemning the rich are lying about on the surface in plain view. The New Testament says that people who concentrate on obscure, fiddly bits of doctrine and miss the bleeding obvious, are "straining out a gnat and swallowing a camel." If Pat read the Bible as closely as he says he does he wouldn't be mining diamonds. He really wouldn't. A wealthy evangelist- it's a contradiction in terms.
When I was studying the Bible the thing that really stood out for me (and made me feel extremely uncomfortable) was the bit about how hard it is for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of Heaven. I wasn't exactly rich back then, but I was comfortably middle-class and it gnawed at me that I wasn't poor enough to satisfy God. It was reading the Bible that made me a socialist (of sorts.) I didn't (and don't) see how a serious Christian can jump any other way.
You have to go through the Bible with a fine tooth-comb to find (debatable)texts condemning homosexuality, but the ones condemning the rich are lying about on the surface in plain view. The New Testament says that people who concentrate on obscure, fiddly bits of doctrine and miss the bleeding obvious, are "straining out a gnat and swallowing a camel." If Pat read the Bible as closely as he says he does he wouldn't be mining diamonds. He really wouldn't. A wealthy evangelist- it's a contradiction in terms.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-11 06:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-11 07:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-11 08:04 am (UTC)I feel that my leaving ministry was a move made in strength, not in surrender or cowardice. I could see the guru trap opening beneath my feet, the diversion off the Path I was on, and I feel that I have managed to avoid it. There are two types of power: power over (that of priest/esses and ministers) and power within: that of mystics and adepts. I prefer the latter. It cannot be taken away.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-11 08:22 am (UTC)I have come to think of gurudom as a terrible trap. The teacher gets mired down in his/her own teaching and cannot move on. Besides which, all power, even power exercised benignly, has a corrupting effect on the person who wields it.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-11 08:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-11 09:08 am (UTC)I had realised that fame comes at a price and that if I wanted to sustain it I would have to start selling myself and wearing a mask.
And that the more I wore the mask, the less there would be behind it.
You did the right thing. The only way you could have seen off the predators was to take up the mantle you had already discarded- a retrograde step.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-11 08:24 am (UTC)