A Brief (A Very Brief) History Of Wicca
Feb. 2nd, 2005 11:27 amReligious movements swiftly go out of date. They begin by challenging the status quo, then, once society has caught up with them, slip into conservatism as they defend their aging insights against the onrush of the new.
Wicca began as a challenge to the mores of the 1950s. It was always a little old-fashioned- with a whiff of geriatric naughtiness- and was soon overtaken by the sexual revolution of the 1960s. It was reinvented in the 70s, by Starhawk and others, as a vehicle for left-wing protest and feminist assertion. Now, unless I'm missing something, there's nothing much left in it except a nostalgia for ye olden dayes.
Charmed is the monument erected over its grave. If the US entertainment industry thinks something is safe for the mainstream, you can be pretty certain it's no longer prancing and kicking.
Wicca began as a challenge to the mores of the 1950s. It was always a little old-fashioned- with a whiff of geriatric naughtiness- and was soon overtaken by the sexual revolution of the 1960s. It was reinvented in the 70s, by Starhawk and others, as a vehicle for left-wing protest and feminist assertion. Now, unless I'm missing something, there's nothing much left in it except a nostalgia for ye olden dayes.
Charmed is the monument erected over its grave. If the US entertainment industry thinks something is safe for the mainstream, you can be pretty certain it's no longer prancing and kicking.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 05:30 am (UTC)I'm not sure I agree with you about Wicca no longer being prancing and kicking because it's on mainstream TV. If you think about it, it could be called progress. After all, is it really that much fun to be persecuted?? At least pagan religions are becoming somewhat more acceptable; no more burning people at the stake, or automatically assuming that they are worshipping Satan. Sure, there are still Christian fundamentalists out there who haven't a clue, but I think that more and more people are at least becoming knowledgeable enough to know that pagans aren't immediately equal to "evil."
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 05:54 am (UTC)And Wicca may be fairly lame and have devolved into a bunch of heirarchical, dogmatic, organized folks with high self esteem issues, but the calm, quiet, unassuming pagan--even one who knows the root of the word and uses it with a rueful smile--does exist. Maybe that's the revolution--we don't have to wear our religion around our neck, studded with magic crystals.
And that young lady will never be on TV.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 06:15 am (UTC)I like this.
I was young in the middle of the time of hippies, and for a while I wore long peasant dresses and paper necklaces--even went barefoot off to have my first child.
Having children made me settle down a bit, become much more conventional if not conservative. I'm still a hippie in many ways, even though I'm now a little old grandmother. But it's on the inside, simmering.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 06:19 am (UTC)That's not entirely true. I still subscribe to a spirituality that is part Pagan, part Christian, part Zen- I just don't belong to any organization these days.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 06:24 am (UTC)If I miss Samhain this year, it's not shocking--though some would say I'm a bad pagan--any more than if I missed church some Sunday. I no longer feel the need to advertise my faith, though I will talk about it if asked. I think most people in most religions find the simpler, less showy side of spirituality eventually. Despite the rhetoric, we're a young faith, after all--it may take some time for us to mature a bit.
In the meantime, we really ought to try not to sound as stupid as we do, as often as we do. And remember that Mormonism was all the rage at one point, too.
And that's all I have to say about that. ;)
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 06:25 am (UTC)There's a great example, in the New Testament, when Peter (I think) wanted to erect tents at the spot where he'd seen a vision of the Elders.
"The glory of the Lord settled on Mount Sinai."
"Lord, it is good to be here."
I guess what I want to say and am meandering away from is that all religious movements have their start with a moment of miracle that we want to keep. Maybe it's not a miracle, just a wave of joy, or a changed life. But something major happens, and we want to be able to reopen that door.
Sadly, most miracles take us by surprise.
As you once wisely said (I hope I paraphrase correctly): Ritual's purpose is to set up the atmosphere to open the door to miracle again.
But mostly we can't do it. The door may open, but we don't see it. We're fixated on the candles.
For example
I think a wonderful image, very apt, that explains the reason spiritual moments get instantly crystallized into religious doctrine
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 06:26 am (UTC)I'm an unassuming (quasi)-pagan these days. But I was waving my staff and swinging my pentacle all over the media throughout the 90s.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 06:33 am (UTC)I regard Gerald Gardner as one might a reprobate old uncle. He was very brave and very mischievous and very naughty. I love him a lot.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 06:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 06:42 am (UTC)Yes, you can't institutionalize vision or joy or any spiritual thing.
Wicca was a great event in the history of the 20th century, just as Methodism was a great event in the history of the 18th. Of course the movement will continue- just as Methodism has done- but (barring a new miracle) it no longer has the capacity to challenge and surprise.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 06:44 am (UTC)As much as the idea that Wicca is itself the oldest religion is ridiculous, I think it is appropriate to note that Gardner did not invent paganism (defined as the polytheistic worship of pre-Christian gods) and while most of the knowledge of ancients good and bad is lost, one is perfectly capable of praying to Athena without invoking St. Gerald at her side. I do not, and have not for many years, consider myself Wiccan.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 06:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 06:51 am (UTC)Mao tried to create "permanent revolution". It didn't work- and millions of people got hurt in the process.
I don't think the fringe is impotent though. It's at the fringe that the discoveries are made- which the mainstream then assimilates.
In some ways things like Charmed make me happy. It's nice to see those ideas being absorbed.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 07:00 am (UTC)I remain a polytheist.
Wicca is what I know of neo-paganism. It's the group I belonged to for ten years. I think it has lost the plot (though I'd be happy to be proved wrong.)
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 07:00 am (UTC)He's been called a blend of motivational speaker and minister. He's always smiling, talks about time management.
It's a new religion for the 2000s: optimism, practical ways to use the Bible's messages to be happy and productive.
But it's got to be more than that. Like Billy Graham, it's partly the messenger: they offer the gift of personal surprise in a person life--in short, a sense that a miracle is taking place.
Dangerous, when a religion is centered around a person.
What happens when those 25,000 people show up, and their miracle-channeling pastor has retired?
I'm still beating my same drum--I know so little about the movement of Wicca that I can't comment intelligently. But it seems to me that the movement surely arose because, as you say, Methodism and other mainstream religions had become so crystallized and institutional that there was no longer "the capacity to challenge and surprise."
What will be next? There will be something.
My thought is that charismatic preachers who are making amalgams of mainstream conservative Christianity and Coveyspeak are the transition phase--they are making Christianity exciting again, promising new lives.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 07:07 am (UTC)In my later years as a "Wiccan" we had moved a long way away from Gardner and were running what was essentially a pagan temple dedicated to Hermes, Aphrodite and the Unconquered Sun.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 07:16 am (UTC)Who knows what happens next.
Are those guys making Christianity exciting again or are they diluting it? It seems to me that they are working an accomodation between Christianity and the crassest kind of materialism. I find it hard to see them as a source of hope.
Hey- quite off topic- I've just got myself one of those Holga cameras. Wot larks!
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 07:24 am (UTC)Welcome to Upsidedown Land, where the skies are always turquoise or cobalt blue and treetrunks orange or shot with ambient light!
Speaking of miracles: you are about the see your world utterly changed.
We should be getting our next batch of film soon.
Loading the camera is a bit of a trick in itself, your first challenge with Holga!
Lucky for you, there are all sorts of websites available to help you--just Google "loading Holga camera" or something similar. Hint: a little piece of cardboard will help when you're trying to get the long piece of film to advance--
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 07:28 am (UTC)i have to disagree with that. it's true that miracles often take us by surprise, but i don't think it's sad.
when i was a senior in high school i had to come up with a motto for my yearbook entry...it was "expect a miracle."
miracles happen all around us every day...and if we are lucky we can have a hand in helping a miracle happen.
i too am a zen pagan. i lit candles for brigid this morning before work...i have a go with the flow life (although occasionally the river gets dammed...)
bright blessings and i will try to come back to this discussion later when i have time to think...
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 08:05 am (UTC)no, it is not. Or, I respectfully choose to disagree with that statement.
I have read this discussion with great interest, but I find there are words I want to add and can't quite come up with them. I think that one thing demonstrated here is that religion is a personal thing, and we need to be comfortable with the way we believe.
I'm still unable to breathe, perhaps my thoughts show that.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 08:36 am (UTC)Our camera came with a roll of black and white film. I'm now wondering what on earth to go take pictures of. A run-down cemetery would be nice, but we don't have any of those within walking distance.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 08:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 09:10 am (UTC)however, i think that you should know that, whatever you are doing faithwise now, as an activist you have done great good for the "pagan community," whatever you perceive that to be ;)
i have trouble codifying my rituals, because i am not wiccan and i don't really follow a particular path...my goddesses are as varied as brigid, kwan yin, spider woman and eris.... (i still think eris gets shafted) and while i don't have the discipline to be a solitary anything, i don't want to really share my feelings and beliefs with anyone who might make fun....
at least when i was a methodist, nobody made fun of me....
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 09:35 am (UTC)Our best shots--admittedly, we've only used one our one free roll so far--were made with a simple subject (big enough--not an apple on the ground as a center of interest! Which failed me!) and a relatively uncluttered background.
Holga does wonders with clouds! Try getting a big sky with clouds!
And I'm going to try putting a bit of vaseline on a square of clear plastic, and taping the plastic over the lens for a couple of shots, to see if I can get a surreal bloom!
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 09:36 am (UTC)Here's a picture of me and Ailz at work in our temple
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 09:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 09:42 am (UTC)We're going up town tomorrow to do some shopping. Maybe I'll load up Holga and take her with me.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 09:52 am (UTC)Okay, you've given me something here: "religion is a personal thing."
Yes. Absolutely.
When people go into bars, there are usually no windows. It's usually dark inside.
The world is shut out so that the mind can loosen itself from the everyday.
Same for going into church: regular glass that looks out onto a parking lot is exchanged for stained glass with pictures of saints. The world is shut out.
There's a difference in bars and churches--there's no ritual in a bar--but, still, we're trying in both to be liberated from everyday thinking. In bars we do this chemically to the brain, and smooth the way to freedom with darkness and atmosphere.
When we go to church, surely we must take some hope for a surprise, for a miracle, in the door with us ("Lord, it is good to be here.")
In short, it's easier to be taken by a miracle in a place that is charged with energy and hope, perhaps, than, say, in the shower at home.
And there is group energy. I have felt it. It is extemely potent. It's partly emotion. It's partly expectation.
Expectation: that's the word. That's what the structure and the words provide. You can go to the Faith Promise Freeway Primitive Baptist Church and experience a miracle. Your life can be changed.
Not because they all handle snakes with reverence, but because YOU "expect a miracle."
Which makes me wonder, all over again: what is a miracle?
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 10:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 10:38 am (UTC)...we used to practice religiously (if you'll pardon the pun) but tc lost heart when his eyes began to go bad. he gave up his membership in the lodge (a small group of kabbalists...) and we don't do regular circles the way we did when it was just me, tc, and sean...
...cheron is more faithful, but she is solitary and marcey isn't particularly comfortable with our rituals...
here is a quote that i serendipitously found while i was eating lunch...
Work and house and errands and physical fitness and activities and things. The expediencies of every day. This cannot be all there is.
Something more is calling. It is of the past, it embodies tradition, yet tradition is only the vehicle. It is of the heart, but it is more than diffuse sentiment. Some of it is dimly remembered, yet remembered for a reason.
It is a coherent way of life and the taste of home. It is a way to teach the children right and wrong, consciousness, history, and an appreciation of all we have. It connects them to their garndparents and mine.
It is an ancient religion. It beckons, and half the time I am not even sure why. Its rituals tantalize and will not be denied.
What is the lure of ritual when passionate believe is hardly ever to be found, when fulfillment of ritual is a matter of choice? It is more than the preservation of an empty vessel. It is the conviction, deep and unspoken, that ritual, the vessel, contains a precious substance, though I cannot name it. My ignorance is the problem, not that of the vessel.
Why do I, having long ignored the rituals, yearn in their direction? Some of its caretakers ave been those I loved best and respected most. I cannot forget them. I start from there. Miriam's Kitchen-a memoir Elizabeth Ehrlich, ISBN 0-670-86908-2
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 10:43 am (UTC)YOu see, I don't agree with you about the inside of a church being charged with energy and hope. I find energy and hope when I stand in a forest surrounded by trees and growing things. I find energy and hope when I stand on the shore of Lake Ontario and watch the water - especially in the surging waves of a windstorm. I found energy and hope when I stood ankle deep in the water, the red sands of Prince Edward Island beneath my feet, and watched the sun come up. I found energy and hope in the pounding waters of Niagara Falls.
Conversely, I found energy and hope when I stood on the farthest up level of the CN Tower, in the dark, and looked out on the city of Toronto below me, the lights scattered like handsful of glitter tossed across the wrinkles of a child's blanket.
See what I mean?
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 10:56 am (UTC)But for several years ritual was a great delight.
Some of the best times I've ever had were in that temple.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 11:52 am (UTC)See what I mean?
Yes. I do see. Lovely imagery, too.
I was following a train of thought about why we set up places apart. For some people, those places aren't necessary.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 03:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 05:18 pm (UTC)--------
I always thought Wicca was "the Old Religion," so I am surprised at what I have read in this discussion!
Eva
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 05:25 pm (UTC)---------
Kitten, this will crack you up...I read the above as "if we are lucky we can have a hard-on helping a miracle happen."
Oh, God, maybe I *am* getting better after all.
And BTW thanks for the signpost to this most interesting discussion!
Eva
no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 06:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-02 06:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-03 12:44 am (UTC)People in ancient Rome didn't think of themselves as Pagans (a slang term invented by early Christians) but as devotees of Aphrodite or Mithras or Isis or Whoever.
Wicca is a modern Pagan cult (or family of cults) with a history that cannot be traced back beyond the 1940s.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-03 05:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-03 05:29 am (UTC)okay, eva...now i have to clean tc's monitor!!!! just kittened diet coke all over it.