Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
poliphilo: (Default)
[personal profile] poliphilo
Lucian Freud was pond life. Artists often are. I suspect we'd find (if we had more information) that Titian was pond life too. It's expected. And condoned. Last night's fawning doc about his life and work invited us to smile indulgently at the mountainous gambling debts, the abandoned kids, the way he had his wife go sit in the corner with her face to the wall while he ate the meal she'd prepared for him. He loved animals and painted people as if that's all they were. 

I've always liked his work. It has an intensity. Especially the early stuff. His current fame perplexes me. His meaty nudes remind me of Schiele and even more of Stanley Spencer- and yes, they're impressive and painterly, but I can't see what's so original about them. I'd go further. I think they're distinctly old-fashioned. He was always inclined to theatricality (as was pointed out, then swiftly discounted in the film)  arranging people in contorted poses and elaborate tableaux that could never exist outside the studio. I note that he admired Rodin (I spotted at least two Rodin bronzes in his living room) and while Rodin was definitely a master he was also a bombastic, hollow-hearted, old faker.

Freud was under-rated for much of his career, then elevated by the market into a grand maitre whose work now sells for tens of millions. He ticks boxes. He's easy for the rich to understand. By the end of his career he was servicing high society- painting people like Kate Moss, Andrew Parker-Bowles and Elizabeth Windsor- flattering them by not flattering them, if you see what I mean.  I expect his reputation to fall again- and eventually settle somewhere in the second division- ahead of fellow pond-lifer Augustus John, abreast of his old mucker Francis Bacon and well below Spencer and Hockney.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2012-02-19 08:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
I think that's a wholly understandable reaction.

Date: 2012-02-19 02:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] michaleen.livejournal.com
Perhaps Schiele-esque, but Schiele was a vastly superior artist.

Have you actually stood before a casting of the Gates of Hell?

Date: 2012-02-19 02:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lblanchard.livejournal.com
We have one in Philadelphia, I think -- as the entrance to the Rodin Museum, which boasts the largest collection of Rodin castings outside Paris.

Date: 2012-02-19 05:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] michaleen.livejournal.com
Larger than the collection at Stanford?

Date: 2012-02-19 08:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
I've been to the Rodin Museum in Philly. I guess it must have been in 1975.

Date: 2012-02-19 08:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
I agree about Schiele.

I believe I have seen a casting of the Gates of Hell, but it's a long time ago.

Date: 2012-02-20 12:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] michaleen.livejournal.com
There is one at Stanford. My then wife worked at Stanford Med, just across the street, so I would often stop by, often with a book. Behind the Gates, on the other side of the wall, was the Stanford museum, which included the Golden Spike. I always found it curiously appropriate.

Anyway, The Gates of Hell is a remarkably impressive piece, probably my favorite bronze of all time.

Date: 2012-02-19 02:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lblanchard.livejournal.com
I googled him. God, his stuff is ugly. I much prefer Nelson Shanks. Who as far as I can tell is NOT pond life, although I can attest that he can be a little irascible.
[edited to correct typo]
Edited Date: 2012-02-19 03:33 pm (UTC)

Date: 2012-02-19 08:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
Thanks for introducing me to Shanks. I hadn't seen his work before.

Date: 2012-02-19 02:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] internet-sampo.livejournal.com
A very good point. Vanity Fair had an article on him a few months ago and it tried very hard to make him likable.

Date: 2012-02-19 08:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
People do seem to have been fond of him, so he can't have been wholly obnoxious.

Date: 2012-02-19 06:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aellia.livejournal.com
The weirdest bit,for me, was him having his daughters pose for some nude paintings. No wonder their faces was painted in a bright shade of red.
x

Date: 2012-02-19 08:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
:)

Yes, I found that weird too.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2012-02-21 09:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
His people are dead behind the eyes.

Date: 2012-02-20 03:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sina-says.livejournal.com
What do you mean by the phrase "pond life"? Is this a Brit-ism I'm not familiar with? Google is of no help here.

re: Freud. Yes. Pretty much what you said, though I'm not so sure about the Schiele.

Date: 2012-02-21 09:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
I suppose it must be a Britishism. It's another, more colourful, way of saying "scum".

Profile

poliphilo: (Default)
poliphilo

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 23
4 5 6 7 8 910
1112 13 14 15 16 17
18 192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jan. 20th, 2026 12:36 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios