I wonder what we mean by the word "holy". Does it have any content at all?
Perhaps we should stop using the word "holy" and substitute something neutral like "religiously significant". Why do we have to play along with the language of religious fanaticism?
I fear you are correct.
Date: 2004-08-13 06:02 am (UTC)Re: I fear you are correct.
Date: 2004-08-13 09:26 am (UTC)Perhaps we should stop using the word "holy" and substitute something neutral like "religiously significant". Why do we have to play along with the language of religious fanaticism?