I wonder what we mean by the word "holy". Does it have any content at all?
Perhaps we should stop using the word "holy" and substitute something neutral like "religiously significant". Why do we have to play along with the language of religious fanaticism?
OK, seriously, I agree with you, although I wouldn't denigrate holiness because of this. After all, things are "holy" if they are beyond reason, and it is in the realm of passion where people can do great harm ... or create things of great beauty.
I fear you are correct.
Date: 2004-08-13 06:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-13 07:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-13 09:26 am (UTC)Re: I fear you are correct.
Date: 2004-08-13 09:26 am (UTC)Perhaps we should stop using the word "holy" and substitute something neutral like "religiously significant". Why do we have to play along with the language of religious fanaticism?
no subject
Date: 2004-08-13 09:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-13 10:15 am (UTC)