Retouching
Jul. 8th, 2008 09:29 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Alesha Dixon had a really good show on BBC 3 last night- all about the retouching of photos in glamour and fashion magazines and how it makes young women despair of their bodies. Did you know that every image of every woman in every glossy magazine has been worked over- her pimples removed, her hair untangled, her eyes brightened, her figure adjusted, her legs lengthened? Well I suppose I did, but only at a semi-conscious level. Mostly we still think that if it's a photograph it's got to be true- because as some idiot once said, "the camera doesn't lie". Well the camera may not lie, but the computer does- and Alesha showed us just how its done and how far it goes. As an extreme example of what can be achieved one of the evil magicians waved his wand over an honest picture of Alesha's wrinkly (but handsome) old mum and turned her into a peachy-skinned 17 year old. And not actually so extreme, because these tricks are regularly performed on elderly celebs and the results are everywhere. Alesha challeged the glamour and fashion mags to run an unretouched picture of herself on their covers- but of course the editors were all in meetings when she rang. In the end the Mirror's Celebrities magazine- a supplement to the Saturday or Sunday paper- picked up the gauntlet and ran just such a picture- and very attractive it was too. Alesha is a phenomenally beautiful young woman; to think that her image needs tidying up- well, it's crazy!
Of course there's nothing new in the blanding out of images of women. Before there was digital retouching there was airbrushing and before there was airbrushing there was Thomas Gainsborough. And women have always punished themselves in an attempt to live up to the look they're being sold. Todays young women get boob jobs (we were shown one of them on the operating table- I had to look away- it was like watching a chicken carcass being stuffed); in the 18th century- Gainsborough's era- they used to poison themselves with slatherings of white lead. What's new is the overwhelming presence, the inescapability, of the propaganda of the beauty industry. You know what? I think the magazines that service it- that run the images- which means all the glamour, fashion and celebrity magazines aimed at women and girls- are worse than top shelf porn. The porn magazines only tickle lust (and is that so bad really?) whereas these others spread self-hatred and despair.
Bodies: we're stuck with them. We want them to reflect the beauty of our inner beings and they don't (though Alesha's comes close) and there's nothing we can do about it- though God knows we try. Down the years I've tried to educate myself to see the beauty in what's actually there- to get rid of the ideals that have been planted in my head and enjoy the quirky, the individual, the characterful, the jolie-laide- but its like dragging a barge upstream whilst swatting away mosquitoes. Our culture- in a degraded parody of the Grail Quest- is mad for an unreal, unrealisable beauty- and bombards us with its dogma and cult images. How does the individual stand against it? I don't really know- you just grit your teeth and put your head down and push on forward- but well done, Alesha, for trying!
Of course there's nothing new in the blanding out of images of women. Before there was digital retouching there was airbrushing and before there was airbrushing there was Thomas Gainsborough. And women have always punished themselves in an attempt to live up to the look they're being sold. Todays young women get boob jobs (we were shown one of them on the operating table- I had to look away- it was like watching a chicken carcass being stuffed); in the 18th century- Gainsborough's era- they used to poison themselves with slatherings of white lead. What's new is the overwhelming presence, the inescapability, of the propaganda of the beauty industry. You know what? I think the magazines that service it- that run the images- which means all the glamour, fashion and celebrity magazines aimed at women and girls- are worse than top shelf porn. The porn magazines only tickle lust (and is that so bad really?) whereas these others spread self-hatred and despair.
Bodies: we're stuck with them. We want them to reflect the beauty of our inner beings and they don't (though Alesha's comes close) and there's nothing we can do about it- though God knows we try. Down the years I've tried to educate myself to see the beauty in what's actually there- to get rid of the ideals that have been planted in my head and enjoy the quirky, the individual, the characterful, the jolie-laide- but its like dragging a barge upstream whilst swatting away mosquitoes. Our culture- in a degraded parody of the Grail Quest- is mad for an unreal, unrealisable beauty- and bombards us with its dogma and cult images. How does the individual stand against it? I don't really know- you just grit your teeth and put your head down and push on forward- but well done, Alesha, for trying!
no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 10:16 am (UTC)I've never understood what "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder" really means. I'm thinking about that now.
The Bone Diggers should be good tonight
x
no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 01:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 10:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 01:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 12:07 pm (UTC)One of my friends studies photography and he has a professional camera. He spends a lot of time taking portrait photos of his friends, and all my favourite photos of myself are from him. He uploads them on Facebook and tags me, and I download them to use elsewhere, or even to send my family.
Recently I found out that he uses Photoshop to airbrush all these photos. He showed me how he does it with a photo of his mum - not only did he take away her wrinkles, but he changed the structure of her face.
I don't look at photos of myself very much, and I don't even properly look at my reflection much. It was really weird to find out the image of myself I have been seeing is a computer-edited one.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 01:04 pm (UTC)I'd be interested to see your friend's work.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 12:19 pm (UTC)I think you're so right about that. Erotic imagery can sometimes be degrading, to men as well as women, but it doesn't have to be, whereas the flaunting of the unrealizable ideal is bound to do harm.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 01:08 pm (UTC)Broadly speaking men want women who look like women- that is to say, with curves and a bit of flesh on their bones- whereas women want women (to quote one of last night's participants) who look like adolescent boys.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 02:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 04:02 pm (UTC)Whare does this aesthetic come from? Who decided that stick-thin = beautiful? It's a relatively recent thing. Through most of Western history women were supposed to have curves. Look at Marilyn. That's only 50 years ago, but if she were around today she'd be unemployable.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 05:42 pm (UTC)The really unreal thing these days is that the "ideal" woman is supposed to be skinny with hips like a boy yet have huge boobs. That's just not natural!
no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 06:30 pm (UTC)The girl last night who had the boob job was obsessed with Victoria Beckham. Alesha interviewed her boyfriend- and I though we'd find out that maybe he'd been pressuring her- but, no, he was as perplexed as everyone else. Like most men he finds Victoria Beckham grotesque.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 06:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 06:22 pm (UTC)Not that I have any better explanation.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-09 12:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 08:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-09 08:14 am (UTC)(Actually I believe in the other sort of devil too- only I'm not sure they're bright enough to invent something as complex as the fashion industry.)
no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 01:02 pm (UTC)What's even more disgusting about those magazines is that when women destroy their bodies to live up to the ideal, they are attacked for being anorexic...and if there are models and actresses who have a healthy weight, they are laughed at for being "fat." I'm reminded of the recent runway model who got completely ravaged for being fat on the runway. Yet these same papers scream because models are too thin. The same papers love to post eating disorder claims for too-thin actresses, and then excoriate Jennifer Love Hewitt for having curves.
Women are ridiculed for both, and it's horrible.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 01:14 pm (UTC)Some people in the business are waking up to it. Alesha had praise for Dove- the soap and beauty products manufacturer- which recently ran a campaign featuring "real", unretouched women of all ages and races and shapes. It met with a very positive response from the public- mostly along the lines of, "phew, at last!"
no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 01:11 pm (UTC)http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/04/28/48hours/main551362.shtml
no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 01:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 01:18 pm (UTC)This is just an amateur playing around, so heaven knows what the professionals get up to.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 01:22 pm (UTC)I greatly prefer the unretouched image. That's a wonderful face. Actually, she looks a bit like my sister.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 02:17 pm (UTC)Edit: malformed HTML
no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 03:52 pm (UTC)Thanks for the link- it's a real eye-opener.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 05:44 pm (UTC)My new lawn mower icon is an example of what I do when I play with PhotoShop, but I don't think other mowers are going to get an inferioriy complex because of it. :)
no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 02:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 04:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 04:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 06:43 pm (UTC)(Back when I was young, before such things were more hidden, I was told before I applied for a grad school library job, that the man in charge only hired beautiful blondes, neither of which I was. I didn't get the job, either.)
no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 06:41 pm (UTC)I've always thought that British films more often gave parts to fine actors who didn't necessarily look glamorous or better-than-life, regular, normal-looking people, whereas American movie stars are so perfect that no one can ever look like them in real life, and therefore their careers tend to end at forty when they get their first wrinkles that can't be glossed over (because they are two-feet wide on the screen).
Sad. Sad that we think that way, and discouraging for women especially who leave the theater feeling frumpy, dumpy, ugly, and poor. With regular unshiny white teeth and graying hair.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-09 08:21 am (UTC)I find it hard to tell the latest batch of Hollywood stars and starlets apart. They all- especially the female ones- look the same.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-09 10:26 am (UTC)I read that Bo Derek's husband used to check her over daily for imperfections.
Natalie Portman, who is 26, said she was planning to do other things when she "wasn't pretty enough for Hollywood" anymore. That'll probably be in about ten years.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-09 12:36 am (UTC)A great example is Janeane Garofalo, who always seems to get stuck in the "ugly fat girl role," even though she's neither ugly nor fat.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-09 08:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-09 08:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-09 08:29 am (UTC)I was talking to the pretty little girl next door and she was saying how ugly she is. I think we could be raising a whole generation of children who don't think they're good enough. some of them will go your route (hurrah!) but others will spend their lives consumed by self-loathing.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-09 10:03 am (UTC)I'm afraid the majority of self-loathing children will go down the common road of diets, cosmetic surgery and low self-esteem. I often see the contradiction between the messages that are sent to teenager girls in the media: "you should love yourself as you are," but also the good old "you should be pretty, thin and glamorous." So now they have guilt trips both ways because if you are on a diet you don't love yourself as you are, and if you're not on a diet, you're not trying hard enough. I honestly don't know how the teens can stand it.
Still wouldn't recommend my mother's way, though :) It borders on emotional abuse, which I'm pretty sure is not very legal :)
no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 02:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-11 09:02 am (UTC)