Behind The Arras

[poliphilo]

Hamlet is a play about the surveillance society. Polonius is a spymaster- albeit a stupid one. He hires Reynaldo to spy on Laertes, he uses his daughter as an agent to draw Hamlet out while he and the king eavesdrop, he spies on Hamlet's interview with Gertrude. Traditionally played as a lovable, fluffy-haired, old man, he's actually a controlling bastard who richly deserves what he gets.

And then there's the King- who runs his own spies in the persons of the interchangeable opportunists, Rosencrantz and Guildernstern. 

Elizabethan/Jacobean society was fighting a War on Terror (which culminated in the discovery of the gunpowder plot) and there were spies everywhere. I think we can assume, from the treatment he metes out to them, that Shakespeare didn't like them and counted on his audience not liking them either. Hamlet kills Polonius and is responsible for the deaths of  Rosencrantz and Guildernstern and- as in a James Bond movie- I think we're meant to cheer.

We keep moving into new political territory- only to find that Shakespeare has been there ahead of us.  

Comments

Re: only to find that Shakespeare has been there ahead of us

[poliphilo.livejournal.com]

I know what you mean. I don't think there's ever been a writer- before or since- with such range.

Re: only to find that Shakespeare has been there ahead of us

[saare-snowqueen.livejournal.com]

I can't think of a writer - in English, who even comes close. When I was teaching Spanish students a few years ago they argued that there were writers in Spanish who equaled or bettered Ole Will - Cervantes perhaps, and as I don't read Spanish I really couldn't answer them - but in my heart I doubt it.

Now, in Russian, maybe...........

Re: only to find that Shakespeare has been there ahead of us

[poliphilo.livejournal.com]

Don Quixote is obviously a very great book, but- well, put it this way: Cervantes created two immortal characters- the Don and Sancho Panza- Shakespeare must have created about a hundred.

Re: only to find that Shakespeare has been there ahead of us

[saare-snowqueen.livejournal.com]

I would have tried that argument with them, but... Spanish machismo - you know how it is. I agree with you though.

Re: only to find that Shakespeare has been there ahead of us

[senordildo.livejournal.com]

In terms of playwrights, Lope De Vega might qualify. With regard to Shakespeare's competition, we have a chance of seeing how Middleton stacks up, because a new complete edition of his works has just been released. The TLS just posted a review: http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/the_tls/tls_selections/literature_and_criticism/article3801281.ece
The reviewer is not exactly gung-ho, and the book is very expensive, but I'm going to save up to buy it.
I have to say that Branagh was just about the most irritating Hamlet I've ever seen, and the movie struck me as an elephantine misfire. Someday I'd like to try and see Kozintsev's version, since lots of folks say his is the all-time best.

Re: only to find that Shakespeare has been there ahead of us

[poliphilo.livejournal.com]

Thank you for the TLS review. I'd buy that book if it were- oh- remaindered. I've read a certain amount of Middleton; he's good. But he doesn't fire me up. For one thing he's not much of a poet. For another, I just can't get into City Comedy. I think Shakespeare was wise to give that particular genre a miss.

One of these days I'll take a look at Branagh's Hamlet. I admire him as an actor, think he's a bit clunky as a director. His version of Much Ado veered between joyous and jaw-droppingly bad. Words cannot express how wrong- and unfunny- Michael Keaton's Dogberry was.