The Half Blood Prince
Feb. 1st, 2007 12:25 pmOrder of the Phoenix is the best of the books- considered simply as a book or literary artefact. It's the one in which Rowling stretches herself and her readers the furthest- the one that makes me think of Dickens.
Half Blood Prince doesn't make me think of Dickens. There's a falling back into the comfort zone. It's like Chamber of Secrets on steroids.
Lots of back story. This is more Voldemort's book than Harry's. We're marking time. It's a transitional work, preparing us for what we all hope will be the whizz-bang climax of the Deathly Hallows.
Of course Harry had to fall in love sometime. I wish Rowling cared more about this side of things. I wish, actually, that she was more interested in her female characters. The ones who come alive are the eccentrics- Hermione, Luna, Tonks. She wants us to care about Ginny Weasley and we're eager to oblige- but do we? I'm afraid I don't.
Slughorn is the best new character. I've known teachers like him.
Boarding schools run on sexual energy. All those adolescents. All that celibacy. I wish there could be more than hints of this in the books, but yes- I know, I know- not in front of the children.
The last hundred pages are riveting. But I don't see how I can discuss them without spoilers.
Half Blood Prince doesn't make me think of Dickens. There's a falling back into the comfort zone. It's like Chamber of Secrets on steroids.
Lots of back story. This is more Voldemort's book than Harry's. We're marking time. It's a transitional work, preparing us for what we all hope will be the whizz-bang climax of the Deathly Hallows.
Of course Harry had to fall in love sometime. I wish Rowling cared more about this side of things. I wish, actually, that she was more interested in her female characters. The ones who come alive are the eccentrics- Hermione, Luna, Tonks. She wants us to care about Ginny Weasley and we're eager to oblige- but do we? I'm afraid I don't.
Slughorn is the best new character. I've known teachers like him.
Boarding schools run on sexual energy. All those adolescents. All that celibacy. I wish there could be more than hints of this in the books, but yes- I know, I know- not in front of the children.
The last hundred pages are riveting. But I don't see how I can discuss them without spoilers.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 03:18 pm (UTC)And what do you think of Snape now?
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 03:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 04:04 pm (UTC)He killed Dumbledore in order to preserve his cover- which is what Dumbledore himself would have wanted. Was Dumbledore dying anyway? I think he may have been. Either way, those two have been playing a deep, deep game.
It strikes me that we know nothing of Dumbledore's back story. I expect he and Snape will turn out to have been been intimately connected- perhaps by ties of blood.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 04:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 04:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 09:49 pm (UTC)I suspect the reason he had to first make the UV to Narcissa and then take over Draco's task is in order to sort of save Draco's soul...I wouldn't be surprised if Draco comes out of Hallows at least partially redeemed. Hmmm - Snape or Draco sacrifice themselves to save Harry?
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 10:12 pm (UTC)I think Snape will die- probably heroically. I like your idea that Draco will be redeemed. We've already learned he's not got it in him to be a killer.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 05:51 pm (UTC)although, i really want to know why dumbledore trusts snape so implicitly. i always thought mcgonagall or someone else would have known why.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 07:21 pm (UTC)And was that expedition to find the horcrux all it seems or a ploy to take Harry out of the line of fire?
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 06:26 pm (UTC)I´m wondering how she´s going to tie all this up in under a thousand pages.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 07:32 pm (UTC)Is she limited to 1,000 pages? I'd be quite happy if Deathly Hallows came in at 1,500.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 11:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 05:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 01:20 pm (UTC)OOTP was too long methinks. It did need cutting as there was a lot I thought was superfluous and I don't think anyone dares to edit Rowling.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 05:34 pm (UTC)But I think there are still things to be revealed about his background.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 03:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 04:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 05:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 07:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 08:55 pm (UTC)The book must be bleak--the cover doesn't even have a picture of Harry this time--it's all black.
At least she finished it--I was afraid she'd get writer's block and put it off forever...
I've been enjoying your reviews of the series. It's true that Ginny isn't vivid for me, but I'd never thought before about how much I liked her odd characters more. Interesting!
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 09:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 09:16 pm (UTC)I still have some warm feeling for Snape. Don't know why--maybe it's the actor in the movie.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 09:49 pm (UTC)I think Snape will be one of them- maybe he'll die saving Harry.
And the other will be one that's going to hit us hard- someone we like. Hagrid perhaps or Hermione.
I don't think she'll kill Harry, but I think she's going to make him suffer a lot- a bit like Frodo.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 10:07 pm (UTC)Do you remember that there is a reference to Dumbledore's brother?? Was he a twin? Anyway, that cannon was surely dragged onto the stage for a reason.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 10:21 pm (UTC)There are a lot of brothers knocking about, aren't there? Sirius has a brother. Dumbledore has a brother. And then of course there are the Weasleys. I think there's something significant and thematic going on here
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 09:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 09:51 pm (UTC)I figured we could discuss the spoilery stuff in comments.