Absent Friends
Jun. 27th, 2006 10:37 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I hate it when people delete their journals. It's so sudden and final. One day there's bustle and chatter; the next day the site is empty and ploughed with salt.
So,
kharin and
the_red_shoes, if by any chance you're reading this, I'd like you to know that I miss you.
So,
![[profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
no subject
Date: 2006-06-27 09:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-27 10:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-27 11:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-27 11:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-27 05:40 pm (UTC)Though it's not a diary (unless you made private entries), it seems to me that the main purpose of the journal is for its owner; onlookers may be welcome but it's not a "publication" as such. Still, I don't get the "delete it" vs "just leave it unused for a while" thing, either.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-27 07:34 pm (UTC)I'll go look at those two sites.
I suppose I do see LJ as being a publication of sorts (after all some journals have a readership equal to or greater than that of a small lit-mag)but obviously it's the writer's privilege to delete.
Still, I would prefer it if disused journals remained in existence.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-27 10:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-27 10:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-27 04:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-27 07:28 pm (UTC)Ah well, I hope she'll reconsider.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-27 10:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-27 10:23 am (UTC)But an LJ isn't just a diary. It has readers.