Absent Friends
I hate it when people delete their journals. It's so sudden and final. One day there's bustle and chatter; the next day the site is empty and ploughed with salt.
So,
kharin and
the_red_shoes, if by any chance you're reading this, I'd like you to know that I miss you.
So,
![[profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Though it's not a diary (unless you made private entries), it seems to me that the main purpose of the journal is for its owner; onlookers may be welcome but it's not a "publication" as such. Still, I don't get the "delete it" vs "just leave it unused for a while" thing, either.
no subject
I'll go look at those two sites.
I suppose I do see LJ as being a publication of sorts (after all some journals have a readership equal to or greater than that of a small lit-mag)but obviously it's the writer's privilege to delete.
Still, I would prefer it if disused journals remained in existence.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Ah well, I hope she'll reconsider.
no subject
no subject
But an LJ isn't just a diary. It has readers.