Al Swearengen
Dec. 8th, 2004 09:52 amIt was the final episode of Deadwood last night. Al Swearengen killed two people. One of these was a mercy killing. Aw, the old brute is softening.
And Trixie, the whore who loves Al in spite of eveything- and whom he loves in spite of everything, flashed him a brief smile after several episodes of frostiness. So Al gets a well-deserved happy ending. I'm so glad.
Art is essentially amoral. No that's not right. Art is thoroughly moral; it's just that it works to something other than the Judaeo-Christian system of values. In art we don't particularly love the good and the merciful. Such characters are usually insipid, unconflicted, dull. No, what we go for is energy.
Al, with his spaniel eyes and gorgeous turn of phrase, is full of energy. His energy makes him King of Deadwood. Others aspire, but they shrivel in the sun of his outrageous personality. He hardly needs to kill them; he has already obliterated them with the glory of his superior virtue.
That's "virtue" in the ancient Roman sense. In the sense that one might use it of a class "A" sonofabitch like Julius Caesar.
But is art actually so different from life? How deep is our morality really? Is it anything more than an alibi for timidity and social conformity? Plonk us down in a darkened room in front of the TV screen and the secret's out. We forget all about the blessedness of the meek and revel and roll- like pigs in shit (like the pigs to whom Al feeds the bodies of his victims)- in the wit and wisdom of Al Swearengen.
And Trixie, the whore who loves Al in spite of eveything- and whom he loves in spite of everything, flashed him a brief smile after several episodes of frostiness. So Al gets a well-deserved happy ending. I'm so glad.
Art is essentially amoral. No that's not right. Art is thoroughly moral; it's just that it works to something other than the Judaeo-Christian system of values. In art we don't particularly love the good and the merciful. Such characters are usually insipid, unconflicted, dull. No, what we go for is energy.
Al, with his spaniel eyes and gorgeous turn of phrase, is full of energy. His energy makes him King of Deadwood. Others aspire, but they shrivel in the sun of his outrageous personality. He hardly needs to kill them; he has already obliterated them with the glory of his superior virtue.
That's "virtue" in the ancient Roman sense. In the sense that one might use it of a class "A" sonofabitch like Julius Caesar.
But is art actually so different from life? How deep is our morality really? Is it anything more than an alibi for timidity and social conformity? Plonk us down in a darkened room in front of the TV screen and the secret's out. We forget all about the blessedness of the meek and revel and roll- like pigs in shit (like the pigs to whom Al feeds the bodies of his victims)- in the wit and wisdom of Al Swearengen.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-08 12:45 pm (UTC)My goodness gracious! :)
--Having never seen Deadwood, I can only address the interesting thought "how deep is our morality really?"
My brother and I had an unsettling conversation at Thanksgiving.
I lambasted the system that allows young boys to be brainwashed so that they lose all their former sense of kindliness and can be effective killing machines.
My brother, who was a drill instructor during Vietnam who prepared troops for combat, answered me:
"It is hypocritical to sit here in comfort in the United States and say you would prefer that we not have armies.
"Without armies, you wouldn't be safe and comfortable.
"War is hell. But it's a reality for us."
I snapped back, "So we're talking about Jack Nicholson? 'You can't handle the truth!'"
My daughter and nephew burst out laughing, and all during the day, whenever I'd be talking with my sister or my brother, one of them would touch me gently on the shoulder and say, "You can't handle the truth!"
Which meant the argument stopped with impasse.
My brother said, "I wasn't in Vietnam, but I talked with many people who came back. None of them were grim killing machines. They said that, in the final analysis, they just didn't want to let down their buddies down the line. They were very bonded to each other.
"They thought about their families and their children, and they believed they were protecting them."
--I think we are very deeply moral. But I think our moral stances can change, be rearranged, be justified and rationalized.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-08 01:42 pm (UTC)There's a survey that's just been published in which 85% of serving soldiers are reported as saying that bullying is endemic in the British army.
But of course. Military training is all about brutalizing people.
When my son completed his basic training he showed us a souvenir video. It featured, among much else, a sequence in which my son bayoneted a dangling sandbag while yelling "die, motherfucker, die!"
no subject
Date: 2004-12-08 01:56 pm (UTC)--
When my son completed his basic training he showed us a souvenir video. It featured, among much else, a sequence in which my son bayoneted a dangling sandbag while yelling "die, motherfucker, die!"
I can't think of a thing to say. I'm transfixed by the image. How heartbreaking.
Is there no other way to protect ourselves than to do this to our children?
no subject
Date: 2004-12-08 02:04 pm (UTC)Part of the problem is that the children sort of want to have this done to them. I've always thought the cliche about smug old men sending innocent young men to the slaughter was a crass over-simplification. Young men love the idea of war. We're caught in an endless cycle of machismo.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-08 02:16 pm (UTC)I've always thought the cliche about smug old men sending innocent young men to the slaughter was a crass over-simplification. Young men love the idea of war. We're caught in an endless cycle of machismo.
It's the way we are made, sad to say.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-08 03:05 pm (UTC)I don't think your complaints about the system necessarily implied that you didn't want armies at all; you were merely commenting on a part of the system that you found repugnant.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-08 01:59 pm (UTC)In art we don't particularly love the good and the merciful. Such characters are usually insipid, unconflicted, dull. No, what we go for is energy.
I agree with this. Often, in books and film, the "good guy" isn't all that fascinating. I think a lot of people are glued to what the more complex characters are like. Because people in real life are complex, not all good or all bad...Except for maybe Charlie Manson or Jeffrey Dahmer ;)
no subject
Date: 2004-12-08 02:11 pm (UTC)Al is nicely complex. He's a thieving, murdering bastard, but also capable of real tenderness.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-08 02:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-08 03:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-08 08:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-08 08:39 pm (UTC)What a piece of work that show is. HBO's website for the show is a nice resource, including some great lines (http://www.hbo.com/deadwood/episode/bestlines.shtml) from the show, as well as a running body count (http://www.hbo.com/deadwood/episode/deadcount.shtml).
no subject
Date: 2004-12-08 09:00 pm (UTC)I was surprised to find how many of the characters are based (however distantly and inaccurately) on real people. I was sure Seth Bullock had to be an invention- but no, turns out he was for real.