Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
poliphilo: (Default)
[personal profile] poliphilo
There's something about a prospect of green fields and cows that makes us Brits come over all flobbly-dobbly.

I'm thinking of All Creatures Great And Small, The Vicar of Dibley, Heartbeat- TV shows about warm-hearted country folk, where the worst that can be said of anybody is that he's a lovable rogue.

I blame Wordsworth, myself. All that stuff about learning lessons in morality from the lesser celandine.

But then the country comes to town in the shape of the hunt supporters. Miners or anarchists yelling their hatred at the police is in the natural order of things, but wizened old ladies in green wellies?

The MFHs and the big landowners say there'll be civil war. They have eyes like lizards and snarl in the accents of privilege. A rich man issuing threats is a chilling sight.

Of course its not as simple as country v town. A lot of country people hate the hunt. And a lot of huntsmen are rich townies who have run away. One of the leaders of the protesters is the son of Brian Ferry- the rock star.

The Queen has asked Prince Charles to stop riding to hounds. Apparently (no love lost in that family) he is disregarding her advice. What a silly, romantic fool he is. Trust him to side with his "set" against the will of the British people.

Hatred of the hunt is hatred of the big man on the big horse. As visceral as that. It's been in our blood since the Norman knights rode down Harold's hus-carles at Hastings. Odi et amo. Ooh, you brute.

The hunt is a wonderful spectacle. An unopposed cavalry charge. Red coats against green fields. Yap, yap, yap. Taroo, taroo.

Date: 2004-11-20 11:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sorenr.livejournal.com
There is only one great hunt in Denmark, the St. Hubertus hunt. It takes place all over the country on St. Hubertus's day, and involves loads of horseriders donning their red coats and whatnot. That is, truly, a great spectacle; only things missing from these hunts are the hounds. Oh, and the fox, of course.

Somehow it is nice to have the spectacle and the tradition of it all without having all the arguments and protests about blood sports. I am not personally too bothered about blood sports, but then; I know what foxes do to their prey, and it really isn't all that different. That's nature, I suppose. But then; I see no need to campaign for it either; it's illegal in Denmark, and our countryside hasn't been flooded with foxes... And somehow all the squires and whatnot have managed just fine without this entertainment, so really there's not too much of an argument in favour of fox hunting apart from the fact that some people like doing it. I don't know if a pursuit should be disallowed merely because it is repulsive to the majority of the population, or whether it should go on being allowed merely because it entertains a small part of the population. Both arguments are somewhat dubious to me...

Date: 2004-11-20 11:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
I hate the idea of huntsmen and hunting but I hate ballroom dancing too and I don't think that's a good argument for banning it.

What do the huntsmen do on St Hubertus's day- just ride around aimlessly looking grand?

Date: 2004-11-20 11:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sorenr.livejournal.com
More or less, yes... It's a cross country steeplechase of sorts, really, and the one near Copenhagen is in a deer park and includes a few fences and a moat of sorts (isn't that the word?). It doesn't cater to quite the same class as in England, though; this is mainly an event for riders rather than landowners. (One suspects that quite a few of the participants have never seen a fox in their lives...)

I do like ballroom dancing, though... Please don't ban it!

Date: 2004-11-20 11:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
Awww. You mustn't take it so personal....

Date: 2004-11-20 12:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
There, there. (offers crumpled handerchief out of back pocket.) it's clean. Leastways I think it is.

Date: 2004-11-20 01:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] besideserato.livejournal.com
[Blows her nose noisily] Thank you dearest. I am having such a weekend. I think it's time for me to capitulate and just go to bed. It's a Saturday night, but I could give a fruit fly about it. I need to get myself together.

And no, this is not exactly just about the hunting thing, although that does sadden me. I'm just a little clinical and hungover and lonely right now. It's best I go find a good friend to tuck in with. Ah, yes. Antonio Pigafetta and the marvels of Magellan's travels.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2004-11-20 01:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sorenr.livejournal.com
As I have stated above I am fairly indifferent to this matter, but hey; I'll argue the other side, then:

Female mutilation is wholly un-natural and an entirely cultural, man-made concept, whereas a fox being killed by other animals is not unlike the way things would be, had humans not interfered with wild-life. Animals kill each other, and it isn't always pretty. Thus your argument of "How would you like to be ripped to pieces by dogs?" becomes invalid, and it is merely a matter of whether we should orchestrate such natural cruelty or only allow it to take place on its own as happens in nature all the time.

With the argument turned into a question of whether humans should orchestrate and interfere with nature, issues such as urban development, motorway routing and so on becomes far more important issues, and yet they receive none of the attention that a few fox-hunts do. One might therefore accuse the anti-hunt protesters of aiming their guns at the lesser target; of attacking the easily identified enemy, rather than tackling the pressing issues that currently influence English flora and fauna.

Hmm... the above was merely an attempt at pretending to take your bait, but I guess it only goes to show how irrelevant I find the hunting discussion; it takes up far too much space in public debate and other, more serious, issues are left in its shadow... Ah, well. Anyway; I quite like foxes. There used to be the sweetest little urban fox (probably rabid and whatnot, but cute) in my old neighbourhood; every night at 11pm it would make its round, knocking over the odd bin up and down the road. This normally coincided with my last cigarette of the day, smoken on the pavement outside the terrace, and so I really developed a sort of one-sided relationship with this creature. Antropomorphisation...

Date: 2004-11-20 03:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
Oh yes, this is just the beginning. The hunting lobby is threatening terrible things.

Fox-Hunting

Date: 2004-12-02 11:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hepo.livejournal.com
I'm neither for the Hunt nor against it. And NO! I'm not sitting on the proverbial fence. To explain:

All too often I've seen the English way of life, its traditions and heritage traded away for a handful of votes. Yes, fox-hunting is brutal, and perhaps with an element of thought it can be made less so and still allow the tradition to flourish. And its interesting to note that, MPs have spent, to date, a total of 73 days debating the issue of fox-hunting whereas the subject of whether to go to war with Iraq totalled the grand sum of 7 hours.


P.S. Yes, do ban Ballroom dancing. The way those dancers cavort on the floor, scandalous!

Yours

Hepo

Re: Fox-Hunting

Date: 2004-12-02 12:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
I've wobbled on this issue down the years. It's a core-Labour voter, class-war sort of issue and I'd have expected it to have been sorted during Blair's first term. Like you I think it's crazy that it's taken up so much parliamentary time.

Profile

poliphilo: (Default)
poliphilo

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 34567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jun. 3rd, 2025 12:17 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios