On the Daily Telegraph site the jerky footage of a bloodied Gaddafi being roughed up by his captors is preceded (sponsored) by an advertisement for a car.
Nineteen people apparently walked/rode past/over that child. Nineteen. On the Mail's website they have to edit the footage down, presumably because Mail readers can't maintain the attention span necessary to watch the original, and just want the edited highlights, where vehicles roll over her limbs / pelvis.
Apparently the problem is, if you kill someone you have to pay for their funeral costs. If you wound someone, you have to pay for their treatment for the rest of their life. And judges are known for assuming that whoever brings a wounded person in must have done so because they were the party who wounded them (there was a famous case where the good samaritan who brought in a wounded old lady was made to pay for her treatment). So I don't think it's brutalisation so much as people thinking "shit, if I pick this kid up, my own family will be poor for the rest of my life..."
China is such a very different society. I once proposed to myself that I would make a study of Chinese culture and history- and then I lost my nerve...
It is a richly rewarding field of study. I've dipped into ancient Chinese history and culture off-and-on for the past decade. One of the first hurdles is overcoming the official Chinese interpretation of their ancient history. After that, it gets challenging.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-21 12:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-21 04:25 pm (UTC)How did all those people come to be so brutalised?
no subject
Date: 2011-10-21 06:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-21 08:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-22 10:27 am (UTC)