Lets Kill Hitler

[poliphilo]

It was set in Nazi Berlin- with the Fuhrer's office recreated in a set that was one of the biggest ever built for the show, but it could have been set almost anywhere. Hitler put in a brief appearance, only to be shoved into a cupboard (quite literally) and forgotten. This wasn't a show about Hitler or fascism or the Third Reich but about the incresingly knotty relationships and criss-crossing time-lines of the Doctor and his hangers-on- and it used the nazis as window dressing. In earlier incarnations the show was about the times and places its characters visited (it began as a wizard way of teaching the kiddies a little history) but now it's mainly about the logistics or illogistics of time travel and how weird it is that your daughter is older than you but used to be your childhood friend.  Stephen Moffat has been defending himself against the charge that the stories are too complicated and- fair enough- there's nothing wrong with making an audience think- but what if the stories have become so complicated there's no space left for any proper drama or character development?  

The doctor died again and then came back to life. Oh, please- stop teasing us! The Doctor is Immortal and if he were really to die the show would end with him- and that's not going to happen anytime soon, is it?  Besides if this Doctor were to die we might get a replacement with a little more presence and gravitas- and would that really be such a bad thing? 

Comments

[setsuled.livejournal.com]

I don't on principle disapprove of a series changing over time. Certainly there was a lot about the Tom Baker era that was different from the William Hartnell era. I doubt a series could be good for as long as Doctor Who has been around without some changes. I see nothing wrong with focusing more on the character relationships or making stories about the possible complications of time travel. The problem, to me, seems more likely that, as you said to sovay, Steven Moffat has become overstretched and it's led to a very rushed feeling story. Though I think this is also a problem coming from the generally one-part episode format. I agree with Sonya about Matt Smith--especially in "The Big Bang", I thought he very believably conveyed someone with centuries of wisdom. Maybe it just depends on what a person reads into someone's manner.

I have to say I really liked the tiny people in the human sized robot playing God. It's like, "If God did not exist it would be necessary for mankind to invent him" coming true.

The doctor died again and then came back to life. Oh, please- stop teasing us!

I definitely agree with that. It has all the impact of a maiden tied to train tracks.

[poliphilo.livejournal.com]

The stories Moffat wrote during the RTD era were full of feeling. He seems rather to have lost the knack of that since he became show runner. Instead there's sentimentality.

There's a lot of ingenuity still. Yes, the robot with the little people inside was pretty cool.

I quite like Smith. I want to like him, because I love the show. But I think he's an over-promoted character actor- without the necessary screen presence. Maybe what I'm saying is I still miss David Tennant.

[setsuled.livejournal.com]

The stories Moffat wrote during the RTD era were full of feeling.

Those were definitely great.

He seems rather to have lost the knack of that since he became show runner. Instead there's sentimentality.

There is definitely that, but it's not nearly as bad as RTDs finales. Maybe part of the problem is that Moffat feels compelled to adhere to an RTD model.

Maybe what I'm saying is I still miss David Tennant.

He was very good.