Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
poliphilo: (Default)
[personal profile] poliphilo
If you didn't know the book you'd be baffled by the movie, but everybody knows the book, so no problem.

It marks the point in British cultural history when- after decades of contempt- Victoriana became cool. Watching it now I find myself falling in love again with the clothes, the hairstyles, the clutter, the hymns. 

The casting is so odd- and touching. The very old Finlay Currie- craggy Scots patriarch of a hundred Saturday afternoon classics- in dialogue with the very young Alan Bennett, the sublime John Gielgud dancing the lobster quadrille with bad-boy journalist turned Christian moralist Malcolm Muggeridge, thirteen year old Anne-Marie Mallick- the non-professional- treating the assorted show-offs  with detached contempt, asking questions they sidestep or refuse to answer. 

It's as if Miller had gathered his mates together for a lazy summer's afternoon of fun and frolics- and some of them were very famous and some of them weren't.  Great actors of several generations- Gielgud, Redgrave, Sellers- rub shoulders with the Footlights gang.  Keep your eyes peeled and you'll spot a very young Eric Idle in a non-speaking role.

If Julia Margaret Cameron (whose work Miller studied in preparation) could have made a movie it would have looked like this. 

Date: 2011-08-29 04:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
One of the problems any adaptor has to face is that the books are so very verbal. There's not a lot of action. Mainly the characters just talk (and recite).

Also they're infused with a deep melancholy- which is not what is wanted in a kiddy's film.

I agree about the Disney version. It looks marvellous, but that's just about all it has going for it.

Profile

poliphilo: (Default)
poliphilo

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 23
4 5 6 7 8 910
1112 13 14 15 16 17
18 192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jan. 19th, 2026 12:18 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios