Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Monarchy

Oct. 24th, 2004 10:33 am
poliphilo: (Default)
[personal profile] poliphilo
Prince Harry comes out of a night club. The paparazzi mob him. He lunges at one and cuts the man's lip. Pictures are published showing a red-faced prince being restrained by his bodyguards. Oh dear!

He is driven away with his head buried in his hands.

The British monarchy has had its good times and its bad times. This is one of the worst. Ever since the death of Princess Di the family has been under close and hostile scrutiny.

This very bad patch follows a very good patch. From about 1890 to 1970 the royals were a national asset. Though practically powerless they embodied the national myth. Their strength as symbols depended upon the rest of us knowing very little about them as people. And this depended upon the media keeping us ill-informed or- in other words- failing to do its job.

When I was a kid the Queen was a woman in fancy dress with a porcelain complexion who appeared on biscuit tins. She was only marginally more real than the tooth fairy. The adults around me talked of her as if she and Jesus were closely related.

And now the media intrudes and the Royals are hunted like foxes. The Queen is a sour faced old lady with an inexplicable taste in hats. She has managed to preserve a little of her aloofness, but the rest of her family have been pitilessly exposed as dim, sulky, arrogant and out of touch. Charles is widely despised and hated for the way he treated his wife. Even those who don’t hate him think he’s a bit of a clown.

They’ve been told they must change- preferably by going down the Scandinavian route and exchanging the coaches and limousines for bicycles and bus passes. But they don’t and they won’t. There’s no very strong public appetite for getting rid of them, so the show seems set to limp on and on.

More yobbishness outside night-clubs, more tabloid exposes, more butlers’ tales.

More low-grade entertainment.

Who does it serve and what’s the point?

Date: 2004-10-24 10:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sorenr.livejournal.com
I think the Scandinavian royalty has an advantage, not only through its down-to-earth appearence, but also through their very limited budgets. At least in Denmark the royal family is a bit like a glammed-up version of the rest of us; when the crown prince got married they had to have the wedding dinner in a tent in the back-yard, since they didn't have room enough in the house / palace... -That's just what we did for my 25th birthday party!

Date: 2004-10-24 10:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
Yes- I could cope with that sort of monarchy. Our problem is that we can't let go of our idea of ourselves as an Imperial Nation.

Date: 2004-10-24 10:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sorenr.livejournal.com
Yes... It is not so long ago that the last British empress died, after all... Was it 2002 she kicked the bucket?

Date: 2004-10-24 11:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
Of course. The last Empress of India.

And she was a star. I didn't like her style much, but she had the ability to razzle-dazzle a crowd- an ability that wasn't passed down to her daughter.

For one thing she knew how to smile.

Gosh, it's not that difficult- but the present Queen has been in the job for over fifty years and she still hasn't mastered it.

Profile

poliphilo: (Default)
poliphilo

December 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 34 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Dec. 27th, 2025 12:24 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios