Vince Cable

[poliphilo]

Silly old man trying to look good in front of a couple of encouraging young women. They flatter his vanity and lead him on. It's a honeytrap without the sex.

I'd have fallen for it too. Like Vince I'm the kind of senex who wants to be down with the kids. If you really, really wanted to hurt me you'd call me a sell-out.  I value the shreds of my youthful attitudes more than I value my dignity.

I like Vince all the more for knowing he's this sort of man. Power embarrasses him. He hates the loss of freedom it entails. 

First he squirms over tuition fees. Then he spills his heart to the girls from the Telegraph.

How odd that a man should be undone by his own decency. We want our politicians to be human and real and warm, but when they act that way we call them twits.  

And with reason. If Vince had hidden his true feelings, he could have stopped Murdoch. By blabbing them he's made it much more likely that Murdoch will win.  

If you want to wield power in modern Britain you have to boiler-plate your soul. We complain about our leaders being absolute bastards but if they're not absolute bastards we tear them apart.

Poor Vince: he's too weak/too good for the job. 

Comments

[steepholm.livejournal.com]

I feel far less forgiving, I'm afraid. If I discussed, say, what marks I was thinking of giving one of my students with another student, let alone putting my decision in the context of my personal antipathy, I would expect to be disciplined for lack of professionalism. The same would apply to a judge discussing a forthcoming court ruling (and let's remember that Cable was acting in a quasi-judicial role here, not just a political one - as he himself pointed out). In Cable's case the stakes are far higher, and the damage he has cause is far more serious. Giving Murdoch a stranglehold on the British media is a pretty big mistake to make.

Yes, he's only human, and human beings are weak. But one of the advantages of professionalism is that it can act as a constraint when your own strength isn't enough. ("I'd like to stay for a drink, but I've got an ambulance to drive." "I really fancy this man - but I'm his therapist!" "I'd love to impress this coquettish constituent with what I know, but that would be an abuse of process.") This isn't the same as boiler-plating your soul, in my opinion, let alone being bastard.

[steepholm.livejournal.com]

Sorry about the multiple typos, there - my fingers are frozz!

[poliphilo.livejournal.com]

I take the point about professionalism.

My sympathy for the guy probably stems from my having once found myself is a rather similar position- as an unbelieving clergyman. I eventually resigned. I suspect that's what Vince will have to do in the end.

[veronica-milvus.livejournal.com]

I do agree. In corporate life we are held accountable for our positions of responsibility. We use discretion on what we say to whom, and we don't leak company confidential information. It has always suprised me that some people expect MPs to be rebellious and speak out of turn against the party who selected them to represent their ideology in a constituency. I know that they are sometimes torn because they are also duty bound to represent constituents. but that was not the case here. You would think that the parties would train new MPs by giving them a talk called "How not to embarrass your party and damage your political career". Lesson 1: The Press is Sneaky.

[ingenious76.livejournal.com]

It reminds me of when Sophie Wessex was conned by an "Arab Sheik" into slating the Queen, the Blairs, and a few others nine or so years ago. Everyone heaped bile on the journalist who'd stung her - no-one actually pointed out that she'd been indiscreet and should have kept her opinions to herself.

[ingenious76.livejournal.com]

I agree with you. Plus it was also a discussion of confidential information with third parties, which in my job (and I work in education myself) JI would expect to be disciplined for.