Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
poliphilo: (Default)
[personal profile] poliphilo
According to WikiLeaks the incoming Tory administration was falling over itself to fawn on the Americans. William Hague proudly told Richard LeBaron, deputy Chief of Mission, that he and Cameron and Osborne were all "children of Thatcher". Their anxiety over the possibility that Obama might downgrade the "special relationship" was so febrile that (in LeBaron's words) it "would be humorous, if it were not so corrosive".

What Hague and his colleagues don't seem to have grasped is that the relationship between Reagan and Thatcher (whatever you may think of them) was based on mutual respect. Maggie thought nothing of ringing Ronnie up and giving him an earful

It's nice to know the gambolling of these little dogs amuses their American masters.

Date: 2010-12-04 01:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
Blair set the precedent for cosying up to the US government no matter what. He positioned himself as Clinton's best friend- and then as Bush's. The relationship with Clinton one could understand- both were supposedly men of the centre Left- but Bush?!

Date: 2010-12-04 10:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veronica-milvus.livejournal.com
It has been going on a lot longer than that. World war 1 perhaps. We are one of about ten significant "special relationships" the US has. They are dating several countries, they never said we were "exclusive".

Date: 2010-12-05 10:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
Blair was the first British PM whose cosying up to American power felt like a national humiliation. Churchill and Thatcher acted- in public anyway- as if they were the equals of the American president, Macmillan mentored Kennedy, Wilson kept us out of Vietnam.

Date: 2010-12-05 01:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] michaleen.livejournal.com
I agree: it seems that Blair was the first. His relationship with Bush is more easily understood when one realizes that the differences between Bush and Clinton were more cosmetic than substantial. Both were card-carrying members of the ruling class and served its interests to the best of their ability. In every way that mattered, they both sang from the same page of the hymnal. Bush was a front man for the energy sector and the Western elites, Clinton for Goldman-Sachs and the Eastern elites. What does it matter which faction has its biblical way with the rest of us?

And, yes, I am damned bitter, these days.

Date: 2010-12-05 01:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
I believe Blair is still a bit of a hero in the States. Over here he is deeply hated- and can't show his face in public without being yelled at or mobbed.

Date: 2010-12-06 11:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] michaleen.livejournal.com
I have no idea how the public feels about Blair, over here, since I no longer follow the media, not even vicariously online. No doubt the media still loves him.

Personally, I hate the bastard and always will. Blair was a figleaf for Bush's obscenity, used to create the illusion of adult supervision. It is difficult to imagine an educated man sinking so low.

Date: 2010-12-07 10:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] michaleen.livejournal.com
Tangentially related, but James Wolcott brings a nice article to my attention this morning, about Wikileaks and the state of modern journalism -- and journalists.

I thought it a nice antidote to the gaseous twaddle issuing from Megan McCardle's lower colon, the other day.

Profile

poliphilo: (Default)
poliphilo

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 23
4 5 6 7 8 910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jan. 12th, 2026 09:44 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios