![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
poliphilo50 years ago the sort of people who instinctively hate Barack Obama would have called him a commie. Now the enemy de jour is Islam, so he must be a Muslim. Apparently a fifth of all Americans believe this. He's brown, his middle name is Hussein, he doesn't namecheck Jesus as his personal Lord and Saviour every other sentence so he must be one of them. QED.
And somehow they're missing the obvious fact about him, that's he's the sort of pragmatic political person to whom any kind of ideology is beside the point. He's complex, he spends his life dealing with complex problems- and he knows the simplicities of the Bible and the Koran won't get him very far in framing solutions. If you could get him on the sofa in a moment of absolute candour he would probably tell you that he has far too much on his plate to give much thought to religion.
But ideological people- I was one once so I know- find it very hard to believe that their enemies aren't as ideological as they are .Life is a game of chess and we've chosen white, so that guy over there must be black, right? Tell them the game isn't being played on a board, but in many dimensions, and they blink back in confusion.
It could be that the great struggle going on in the world today isn't a struggle between ideologies- left right, east West, Christian Muslim- but between the ideologues- those who live in a dualistic world of right and wrong- and those who see life as full of complexity and ambiguity. It's a war between crazy conviction on the one hand and clearsightedness on the other. I'd like to say clearsightedness will eventually triumph, as- over the very long term- in spite of many setbacks- it always has- but I find I simply don't have the confidence.
And somehow they're missing the obvious fact about him, that's he's the sort of pragmatic political person to whom any kind of ideology is beside the point. He's complex, he spends his life dealing with complex problems- and he knows the simplicities of the Bible and the Koran won't get him very far in framing solutions. If you could get him on the sofa in a moment of absolute candour he would probably tell you that he has far too much on his plate to give much thought to religion.
But ideological people- I was one once so I know- find it very hard to believe that their enemies aren't as ideological as they are .Life is a game of chess and we've chosen white, so that guy over there must be black, right? Tell them the game isn't being played on a board, but in many dimensions, and they blink back in confusion.
It could be that the great struggle going on in the world today isn't a struggle between ideologies- left right, east West, Christian Muslim- but between the ideologues- those who live in a dualistic world of right and wrong- and those who see life as full of complexity and ambiguity. It's a war between crazy conviction on the one hand and clearsightedness on the other. I'd like to say clearsightedness will eventually triumph, as- over the very long term- in spite of many setbacks- it always has- but I find I simply don't have the confidence.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2010-08-21 01:18 am (UTC)Sweet dreams!
no subject
Date: 2010-08-21 09:05 am (UTC)Mind you- look at Pakistan- another nuclear state- and largely incapable of dealing with the natural disaster that has just hit its people.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-21 12:21 pm (UTC)One problem is that Americans tend to pride themselves on their knowledge of the world, yet their knowledge of the world is filtered through a highly-partisan and privately controlled press -- and done so with fiendish transparency. The manifold sins of the Republican party, and the crimes they commited under the Cheney-Bush junta, have simply disappeared. Now, there is only Obama and the serious debate over whether the Democrats really are destroying the country and what's to be done about it.
No such debate was allowed in the mainstream press during the Cheney-Bush junta. The debate then was whether we had failed the noble ideals and proposals articulated by our Dear Leader after the attacks in 2001. In the end, Bush himself was condemned as having failed his own agenda.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-21 02:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-22 01:04 pm (UTC)It helps to remember that men like Thomas Jefferson were an aberration. They left behind no successors, either cultural or intellectual, and during the American Civil War the last hope or hint of a functional aristocracy in this country was destroyed. And without a functional aristocracy, a civlized society in any meaningful sense of the word is pretty much impossible.
The US, despite all its pretentions, is a nation of ignorant peasants. It was populated by the dregs of the British Isles and it shows. Always bear this in mind and you'll find it much easier to laugh at our imbecilities.