Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
poliphilo: (Default)
[personal profile] poliphilo
Nick Clegg has always believed the Iraq war was illegal. Airing this view in opposition was one thing, proclaiming it from the despatch box quite another. I don't suppose he intended to do it. I imagine he got carried away and the word that he's used so many times before just slipped out.  The government is spinning for all its worth, but his view is on the record now- with the weight of his office behind it.  He has embarrassed his coalition partners- who mostly voted for the war- and given international jurists something to work with if they ever decide to prosecute Blair and his colleagues. Ain't that grand!

Date: 2010-07-22 08:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veronica-milvus.livejournal.com
I don't think Cleggie should change his view of what the previous government did just because he is part of the current one. And frankly I don't think it should need too much spinning. A coalition government includes people with disparate views, by definition, and Cameron should not be surprised if the Libs go off piste now and then. Cameron approved of the war at the time - but like the rest of us, he probably did not have the best information. It seems funny that now, people are expecting him to back his old arch-enemy, Blair.

Date: 2010-07-22 10:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steepholm.livejournal.com
Arch-enemy - or role model? There may be something deep and Jungian going on there.

Date: 2010-07-26 04:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
It's the use of the word "illegal" that has caused so much raising of eyebrows. If he'd said "ill-advised" or "morally indefensible" or something like that it would have had very little impact.

Profile

poliphilo: (Default)
poliphilo

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 23
4 5 6 7 8 910
1112 13 14 151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jan. 15th, 2026 02:41 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios