Teaching History
Jun. 5th, 2010 12:37 pmThe teaching of history in schools is hugely controversial. Rightwing people want it to be all about Nelson and Churchill. Leftwing people want it to be all about the slave trade and the chartists. Apparently the current solution is to dodge aside from the fire fight and make it all about Hitler- because everyone can agree about the rights and wrongs of him.
Quite apart from the politics- or the lack of a "common culture" as Martin Kettle has it- there's the problem of just how much history there is to teach- 3,000 years of it and counting (that is if you don't include prehistory, which archaeology is making less and less opaque). So your grandkids know lots about Martin Luther King and nothing about Martin Luther? Yup, that's bad- but would you really want it the other way round? And where are you going to find time in a highly pressurized curriculum to make sure they learn about both?
Are there things that should absolutely be in the syllabus? Probably. But I don't know what they are, because I can think of so many.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-05 04:24 pm (UTC)I guess Time Team is staged- but isn't everything on TV? We "starred" as ourselves in a short documentary once- and were directed as if we were actors. The number of times I carried that coffee cup into the living room!
no subject
Date: 2010-06-05 05:18 pm (UTC)And I mean cunning Baldric, from Blackadder I. Not stoopid Baldric...
no subject
Date: 2010-06-05 07:32 pm (UTC)Time Team, Blackadder and being roughed up by John Wayne- it's been an interesting and varied career.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-05 07:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-05 08:19 pm (UTC)