Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
poliphilo: (Default)
[personal profile] poliphilo
It used not to be like this.

Until comparatively recently you didn't need to be a purring machine of gym-toned godliness to be a sport's star. You could live a normal life.

Sport- even at the highest professional level- was something people did for fun.

The money was less, the pressure was less.

Andy Murray is getting stick for playing the other night as if he didn't want to win. 

Would that be so terrible? He doesn't need the money. He knows he's capable of beating the best if he's in the mood.

If we couch potato sports fans choose to make a big emotional investment in him that's our look-out. He owes us nothing.

I don't presume to know what he was thinking when he allowed himself to be beaten so tamely- in the dying light on a claggy court-  but it might well have been, "Sod this for a game of soldiers."

Perhaps he had a book back home he wanted to finish, perhaps his favourite TV show was due on and he'd forgotten to set record, perhaps he had a date with his best girl.

There are more important things in life than being the best at smacking balls around.

Date: 2010-06-01 10:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kishenehn.livejournal.com
There are more important things in life than being the best at smacking balls around.


Indeed.

Date: 2010-06-01 11:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
Being a sport's star must sometimes feel like being on a treadmill or hamster wheel.

Date: 2010-06-01 04:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] clindau.livejournal.com
Not to mention that the hamster wheel is inside a glass box with nowhere to hide.

Date: 2010-06-01 07:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
The loss of anonymity- and the privacy that goes with it- must be a horrible thing.

Date: 2010-06-01 10:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wolfshift.livejournal.com
Well, yes, true, but -- if he's a professional, then, game or not, it's his job. What he's paid for is to perform to certain expectations. Anybody in any job will be criticised for not doing that. Not being "in the mood" is almost never an acceptable excuse. If he doesn't want to do the job, he should find a different one.

Date: 2010-06-01 11:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
As G.K.Chesterton once said, "If a job's worth doing, it's worth doing badly."

Murray is effectively his own employer- and gets paid by results. If he performs badly he takes a pay cut. That seems fair enough to me.

If he were playing for a team I'd be be a little less understanding.

Date: 2010-06-01 12:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] halfmoon-mollie.livejournal.com
well, depends on how you look at it. He IS part of a team - he's the head of the team. There's his coach, his trainers and all the other 'little people' who are employed because of Andy Murray. My advice to him would be the next time he'd rather not play, withdraw from the match. What he did was not very professional and it affects his ranking for Wimbledon.

Date: 2010-06-01 12:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
I take your point, but he's the boss. It's his talent that guarantees all those "little people" their wages. If they don't like what he's doing they can leave.

As Virginia Wade said the other day, he's at an age when people are asking a lot of questions of themselves. It's entirely possible he's beginning to hate the treadmill he's on.

Date: 2010-06-01 05:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] haikujaguar.livejournal.com
I feel this way about politicians. We should boot them home after ten years or so. No more careerism.

Date: 2010-06-01 07:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
Power not only corrupts, it tends to turn its holders a bit loopy. I agree that ten years is about as long as anyone can stay in office and remain sane.

Date: 2010-06-01 07:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] haikujaguar.livejournal.com
It may be that the wisdom and experience one gets by remaining in a political career for longer than that are truly necessary to navigating a world stage... but looking at the consequences of political careerism, I'm not sure the alternative is any better.

My art advisor is a good three decades older than I am and about as opposite my political convictions as it's possible to get and still not be a third world dictator... and we both agree that our common enemy is not each other, but politicians as a species. It's as if they hold themselves as a whole different breed from us common folk.

Date: 2010-06-01 09:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
It's a little scary how low politicians have sunk in everybody's estimation. I'm not saying they haven't earned our contempt, but it can't be a healthy thing in a democracy for the electors to lose faith in the political class.

Profile

poliphilo: (Default)
poliphilo

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 23
4 5 6 7 8 910
1112 13 14 151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jan. 15th, 2026 04:39 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios