As Usual

[poliphilo]

So here they come, the first scandals of the coalition. Number one: some silly spat with the BBC over the composition of a discussion panel. Number two: the revelation that the chief secretary to the treasury has been funneling public money to his lover in breach of parliamentary rules. Not big scandals either of them- but enough to signal that the rainbow has faded from the rose garden.

And then- not scandalous exactly, just dispiriting- is the announcement of the names of the deadlegs who are being kicked up to the House of Lords, there to reign over us, happy and glorious. It demonstrates- yet again- that no matter how disgusted the British people may be with your ugly, compromised mug- John Prescott, Ian Paisley, Ian Blair- your fellow establishmentistas can be trusted to see you right. I'm a fan of the House of Lords- sort of-  because of the very many occasions on which it has saved us from horrible, ill-thought-out legislation- but this is absolutely not the way to fill up its benches.

Comments

[poliphilo.livejournal.com]

Someone was saying he comes from a catholic family- and didn't want his mother to know...

Or his auntie

Or his priest.

It doesn't really matter what his excuses are- or how touching his story is- the fact is he misappropriated public money. A chief secretary to the Treasury- like Caesar's wife- has to be above suspicion.

[heleninwales.livejournal.com]

Exactly. If he wanted it all kept secret, that's fine, but then he shouldn't have claimed money for the rent. If their lives were as separate as he's trying to claim, then he should have lived elsewhere and paid the money to a bone fide landlord.

[poliphilo.livejournal.com]

There's also the simple matter of competence. He must have known he was sailing close to the wind, but chose to do nothing about it. Why- when he's shown such poor judgement in a matter like this- should we trust him with the public finances?