So That's What It Was All About
May. 22nd, 2010 10:17 amIf you care about spoilers and haven't yet seen the final episode of Ashes to Ashes, hurry on by.
I suppose the series title was always a socking great clue. It's not just a hip Bowie reference, it's telling us that this is a show about death and dead people. I don't withdraw my opinion that Life on Mars was all we needed- but I do think the final reveal is satisfying and ingenious; I just wish it had come three seasons earlier. So the Gene Genie is running a school for dead coppers in the afterlife- from which they will eventually graduate to either heaven or hell. Yes, I can buy that.
It's a lot better than the conclusion to the US adaption in which the characters turned out to be- *slaps face*- actually on Mars.
There are things that don't quite make sense. Probably lots of them if one were to go over the surface with a magnifying glass. For instance, if Gene Hunt was killed on Coronation Day in 1954, how come the virtual reality he has created around himself replicates a future he never knew? Do they watch the Sweeney in Limbo? And another is, however I juggle it, I can't quite make Sam Tyler's suicide fit the scheme. I'm guessing that was a fudge, caused by Simm's decision to quit the show before the pips began to squeak. His fault. Boo to him. Only he made the right call, didn't he?
I suppose the series title was always a socking great clue. It's not just a hip Bowie reference, it's telling us that this is a show about death and dead people. I don't withdraw my opinion that Life on Mars was all we needed- but I do think the final reveal is satisfying and ingenious; I just wish it had come three seasons earlier. So the Gene Genie is running a school for dead coppers in the afterlife- from which they will eventually graduate to either heaven or hell. Yes, I can buy that.
It's a lot better than the conclusion to the US adaption in which the characters turned out to be- *slaps face*- actually on Mars.
There are things that don't quite make sense. Probably lots of them if one were to go over the surface with a magnifying glass. For instance, if Gene Hunt was killed on Coronation Day in 1954, how come the virtual reality he has created around himself replicates a future he never knew? Do they watch the Sweeney in Limbo? And another is, however I juggle it, I can't quite make Sam Tyler's suicide fit the scheme. I'm guessing that was a fudge, caused by Simm's decision to quit the show before the pips began to squeak. His fault. Boo to him. Only he made the right call, didn't he?
no subject
Date: 2010-05-22 09:38 am (UTC)LoM began to jar on me towards the end - I stopped being interested in what was "really" happening
no subject
Date: 2010-05-22 09:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-22 09:41 am (UTC)Gene didn't create the reality - Sam and Alex did. Sam created a 1970s world based on being a cop in the Manchester he knew as a young lad, and also, in the first ep of the second series, there is a TV showing "The Sweeney", which made me think he was creating a reality, in which his mother was young and beautiful and his dad still a hero to him, and Gene a "father figure."
As for Alex, a young woman, its entirely possibly she was creating that 80s reality based on her own childhood, and wanting to be a cop in an era where you could wear pixie boots to work and go clubbing at the Blitz. The characters of Gene, Ray, and Chris were there to help guide them, but the realites were made by those who joined them.
I think I'm overthinking this.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-22 09:49 am (UTC)I like the idea, anyway, because it removes the stumbling block- and I'd like to think the show's creators had properly thought things through.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-22 09:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-22 10:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-22 10:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-22 01:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-22 10:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-22 10:26 am (UTC)That ending makes me want to go back and watch the series now.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-22 01:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-22 06:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-22 10:32 am (UTC)Thank you,Tony
x
no subject
Date: 2010-05-22 01:48 pm (UTC)