The Nobel Peace Prize

[poliphilo]

Here's a list of the winners of the Nobel Peace Prize

I've got to admit I draw a blank on most of these names. 

A lot of them were diplomats who were simply doing their jobs.

There are one or two real jokers in the pack. Teddy Roosevelt- who loved nothing better than charging up hills with a revolver in his fist- got the prize for brokering a deal between Russia and Japan. Henry Kissinger got it for agreeing to end a war he'd previously been pursuing with vigour.

And then there's Yasser Arafat.  His citation was probably not the only one which- with hindsight- seems slightly premature.

Several of the recipients had nothing to do with promoting world peace but got it simply for being good eggs and an example to us all- among them Albert Schweitzer, Mother Teresa and the Dalai Lama.  

On several occasions the award has gone to organisations- like the Red Cross or Medecins Sans Frontiers- and quite often it hasn't been awarded at all.
 
It's a barmy prize with a barmy history. The award to Barack Obama is hardly out of keeping.

Comments

[lblanchard.livejournal.com]

Okay, since you mention it: I think Old Europe was just plain nutso to heap that much adulation on anyone with as thin a resume as Mr. Obama's, and will come to regret it in due course. I gather the Poles aren't terribly happy with some bits of Mr. Obama's foreign policy right now, and Lech Walensa was publicly incredulous at the Nobel award.

I once was visiting a friend in Darlington, who made some snarky remarks about American policy (this was during the Clinton administration). When I asked him why, he replied, essentially, that it's because Europe is so very dependent on America and has very little influence over what she does. "When America sneezes, Europe catches cold" was how he put it. I'm glad I asked him -- otherwise I would have taken it as another contemptuous put-down of the crass and immature Yanks by an oh-so-superior European citizen-of-the-world. So perhaps there's a bit of bilateral resentment going on here. Mote, beam, eye, and all that. I'll admit to some if you will.

I read Mr. Obama's speech to the U.N. with great interest. If he was really saying "okay, you keep saying you want us to step back and be one of many instead of the 900-pound gorilla; we're ready to do it; who's ready to step up and shoulder some of the world's burdens once we've stepped back?" I say good for him -- one of the most sensible things anyone from the U.S. has said to the U.N. in years. Unfortunately, I don't think he meant it the same way I would have.

[poliphilo.livejournal.com]

Obama's reception abroad has little to do with policy or achievement. It's about the way he looks, the way he sounds- in short, about image. The last US president we took to our hearts was the equally insubstantial JFK.

[michaleen.livejournal.com]

I'm sorry, but I can't think of a meaningful defintion of "just plain nutso" that fits this context.

[lblanchard.livejournal.com]

He had no accomplishments. He hadn't done a blessed thing except give nice speeches until the last year of his state senatorship when the local kingmaker caused his name to be attached to all kinds of bills that others had toiled over. He spent precious little time in the U.S. Senate before going out on permanent campaign. See poliphilo's comment, directly above yours -- he gets it.

I don't get anyone going gaga over the guy. He's an empty suit with a great voice. I think you're all just plain nutso if you do.

[michaleen.livejournal.com]

Your insistance that Obama is just an "empty suit" and that anyone who believes otherwise is "just plain nuts" is simply a way of denegrating those who disagree with your political ideology.

You, my friend, are a sore loser. It's childish and unbecoming and I think rather obviously self-defeating, but I'm afraid all too common among those of a particular political bent.

[lblanchard.livejournal.com]

I love you too! Have a nice day.