Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
poliphilo: (Default)
[personal profile] poliphilo
The thing that was wrong with the boiler was the same thing that was wrong with it in January- the electrics had been flooded with some sort of light, oily, slightly sticky, liquid stuff. The guy in January was mystified. The guy yesterday said it was caused by "the coating coming off the wires". He replaced a part- not the part the other guy replaced- and things are working again.

I watched bits of The Fellowship of the Rings yesterday evening. I don't like it any better than I ever did. Tolkien's book is about the industrialisation of the Midlands- with occasional flashbacks to the First World War- and is the product of a peculiarly English, conservative-romantic imagination.  Peter Jackson doesn't understand the first thing about it- and his film is a coarse, empty, dim-witted travesty. 

Re: LotR films

Date: 2009-09-22 09:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
The Harry Potter films are a lot better than the LOTR films, though, as you say, the later, longer books fare worse than the early ones.

I think it's because Tolkien is a deeper (better) writer than Rowling. The more there is in a book the harder it is to film it adequately.

Profile

poliphilo: (Default)
poliphilo

December 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 34 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Dec. 28th, 2025 07:17 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios