Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
poliphilo: (Default)
[personal profile] poliphilo

Professor Stanley Wells believes that this-

File:First Folio.jpg

The Droeshout engraving- the only fully vouched for contemporary likeness (apart from the pudding-faced bust on the tomb)- and all the other supposed portraits of Shakespeare are derived from this-

File:Cobbe portrait 2009-03-09.jpg

The Cobbe portrait- which - until recently-  was on display in a country house in Ireland. I don't see it myself. All Jacobethan portraits of young-to-middle-aged men look a bit like our idea of Shakespeare- It's generic- but get down to details and nothing fits. Take the eyes; the Droeshout eyes are rounder and more heavily-lidded. Take the nose; the Droeshout nose has a knobbier tip. The cheekbones are different. The forehead (even allowing for Droeshout's man being older and balder) is entirely different. If I'd commissioned Droeshout to copy the Cobbe portrait and he'd come up with what he did I'd have sent him back to his drawing board.

As for provenance, the Cobbe portrait's claim rests on it having been inherited from an 18th century descendant of Shakespeare's patron, the Earl of Southampton. And that's it. No-one seems to have seriously identified it as a portrait of Shakespeare until a modern member of the Cobbe family spotted its similarity to a portrait in the Folger collection - which is universally regarded as an 18th century fake- or more precisely as a 17th century portrait of an unknown sitter which has been substantially altered to look like our idea of Shakespeare. So a faint resemblance- and it is faint- and generic-  to a faked up "likeness" demonstrates that the Cobbe portrait is the source of all the portraits? I don't think so.

There's a book in the offing. Unless it contains killer facts that weren't revealed at the press conference- which seems unlikely- I'm putting the whole thing down to wishful thinking . 

Date: 2009-03-10 10:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veronica-milvus.livejournal.com
I could almost believe they were the same guy but their noses are diffrent shapes. The top one has a bulbous end to it, the lower one is more aquiline. Not convinced.

Date: 2009-03-11 09:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
I think we have to accept the Droeshout engraving as a reasonable likeness. Shakespeare's friends and colleagues commissioned and accepted it- and Ben Jonson went out of his way to praise it.

It's not just the nose, it's the eyes, the shape of the skull and the height and breadth of the forehead. This isn't the same man.

Profile

poliphilo: (Default)
poliphilo

August 2025

S M T W T F S
      12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Aug. 1st, 2025 10:37 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios