Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Rebellious

Feb. 8th, 2009 09:31 am
poliphilo: (Default)
[personal profile] poliphilo
We're not going to church today. There's still ice on the ground- and Ailz is afraid of falling- or of me losing control of the wheelchair on the hill.

Isn't it odd? I've been going to church for just over a month- and already I see it as some sort of an obligation. Do I think God will be angry if I don't go? Well, maybe, because that's how I thought as a child and we never entirely shrug off such things. Of course with my upper- adult- mind I scorn the idea. Why I don't even believe in God.

So why am I going at all? Is it because I feel I owe it to the people?

Here's something I haven't written about yet- or only hinted at.  It's about feeling the need to choose sides. I've been getting increasingly annoyed over the past few years with what I see as the largely mindless embrace of atheistic materialism by the intelligentsia, the commentariat, by the sort of people who set the tone in our world. I don't mean David Attenborough- because his atheism is clearly part of a well-articulated, Darwinian world-view.  I mean journalists, reviewers, comedians, actors- that sort of cannaille. They haven't thought things through or considered the evidence- how could they when they're so busy with their careers?-  they're merely conforming to the fashionable philosophy of the day.  They make me cross.

And rebellious.

Yes, I believe in ghosts/fairies/aliens/angels. Why not?  Show me the evidence that they don't exist. In a quantum universe where over 90% of the matter that must exist is invisible to us I don't see how anything can be ruled out as too far-fetched.

The materialists are still working with a mid-nineteenth century model of the universe.

"What do you believe in, Johnny?"

"Whaddaya got?"

Anyway, that's one of the many reasons I'm going to church- to take my stand alongside the believers- even though their beliefs are not exactly mine.

Oh, and another thing I believe in is intelligent design. Not Genesis, not the Biblical account- which is plainly myth- but in the possibility that evolution is a process set in motion and helped along by intelligence.  Yes I know that's not science- and I don't care. I don't think science- with its dogmatically materialist,19th century guidelines - is capable of giving us a full account of the universe.

Date: 2009-02-08 06:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] happydog.livejournal.com
Personally I have to go along with you.

Here in the United States, atheistic materialism seems to be the unspoken creed, especially among the well-to-do, politicians, talking heads and intellectuals. They pay lip service to various creeds and faiths, and then tend to act like atheists otherwise.

I agree that science is incapable of giving us a full account of the universe - inner or outer. Working in the mental health field it quickly becomes apparent how much of our inner space, however well mapped by x-rays and MRI, is unknown territory.

A guy I feel kin to a lot these days is from your neck of the woods - William Blake. He too was unsatisfied with pseudoscientific, atheist materialism, and he saw acutely the difference between the lipservice paid to faith in his day and the actions of those in power.

Date: 2009-02-08 07:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] daisytells.livejournal.com
Yep, I dig Blake, too.

Date: 2009-02-08 08:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
I love Blake.

"Mock on, mock on, Voltaire, Rousseau,
Mock on, mock on, 'tis all in vain.
You throw the sand against the wind-
And the wind blows it back again.

The atoms of Democritus
And Newton's particles of light
Are sand upon the Red sea shore
Where Israel's tents do shine so bright."

And that's from memory.....

Profile

poliphilo: (Default)
poliphilo

December 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 34 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Dec. 28th, 2025 07:14 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios