Milton's 400th Anniversary
Dec. 12th, 2008 09:40 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
John Milton's 400th birtday is passing off without fireworks or dancing in the streets. They haven't even given him a postage stamp. Newspaper columnists are skirting round the poetry to celebrate his defence of freedom of the press in the Areopagitica. One of these celebrants is Andreas Whittam Smith, the former film censor.
How can you believe in freedom of the press and be any kind of censor?
I haven't read the Areopagitica. I haven't read any of Milton's prose. I haven't ever read more than a couple of books of Paradise Lost. I studied Comus for "A" level and- after initial repugnance- fell in love with it. I like the sonnet "On His Blindness". When I feel like the world is passing me by I mutter to myself, "They also serve who only stand and wait". It's one of my favourite tags.
A patchy record. I'm not proud of it.
It's obvious why Milton is a neglected classic- he's too heavy and humorless, his theology is moribund, we don't like- in fact we detest- the god whose ways he set out to justify. I'd like to say his current eclipse is some sort of passing fashion, but I don't think it is. We read him- if we do- for the gorgeousness of his language- not for anything he has to say about the human condition. He was a man of ideas- many of them bad or half-baked- who subordinated his wonderful imagination to apologetics.
How can you believe in freedom of the press and be any kind of censor?
I haven't read the Areopagitica. I haven't read any of Milton's prose. I haven't ever read more than a couple of books of Paradise Lost. I studied Comus for "A" level and- after initial repugnance- fell in love with it. I like the sonnet "On His Blindness". When I feel like the world is passing me by I mutter to myself, "They also serve who only stand and wait". It's one of my favourite tags.
A patchy record. I'm not proud of it.
It's obvious why Milton is a neglected classic- he's too heavy and humorless, his theology is moribund, we don't like- in fact we detest- the god whose ways he set out to justify. I'd like to say his current eclipse is some sort of passing fashion, but I don't think it is. We read him- if we do- for the gorgeousness of his language- not for anything he has to say about the human condition. He was a man of ideas- many of them bad or half-baked- who subordinated his wonderful imagination to apologetics.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 11:15 am (UTC)I know what you mean about Milton's God - I noticed in the tutorial on Milton I did there were a lot of Northern Protestants - and I wondered briefly if I were selling out, if Milton himself would spit on me if I were on fire.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 12:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 12:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 11:53 am (UTC)There's no point celebrating a poet if nobody finds his work worth reading.
Now if only Tennyson would go out of fashion...
no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 12:17 pm (UTC)Idylls of the King is pretty dreadful (I have actually read it all the way through) but he wrote some killer lyrics.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 12:40 pm (UTC)Not that I'm fond of anybody's verse in that period. To my ears and mind, poetry doesn't get interesting until the 20th century, with an exception for Blake.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 01:18 pm (UTC)Victorian poets didn't see brevity as a virtue. They had an audience prepared to spend hours over novel-length poems. Then along came T.V.
I love Browning. He's got a modern sensibility. He's just about the first English poet since Shakespeare to use the whole of the language- to write serious (as opposed to comic) poems about "unpoetic" subjects.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 03:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 04:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 09:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-13 10:21 am (UTC)I believe he was thinking at one stage of writing an Arthurian epic. Now that could have been really interesting!
no subject
Date: 2008-12-13 11:58 pm (UTC)Yes, exactly! I rather like some of his non-theological poems, but once he starts explicating stuff about God I start wanting to hit him.
I'm not sure if it's a good thing he wanted to write about Arthur, or a good thing he never got to it. *g* I'm on the fence on that one.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-14 09:40 am (UTC)