But I Didn't Want To Be Safe
Oct. 10th, 2008 10:22 amWhen I was four I developed an obsession with a girl called Carol and told her I wanted to eat her. At around the same time I was having lurid fantasies about genitally-imprecise, gender-confused, sado-masochistic sex orgies. Slightly later I developed a big thing about cowboys with their shirts off, and- slightly later still- fell in love with the dark-skinned, half naked slave girl in an illustration to my children's edition of the Pilgrim's Progress. There were Christian and Faithful striding patriarchally through Vanity Fair, manfully drawing attention to themselves- and there was she in the bottom left-hand corner of the plate, with her hair falling about her face and her breast hanging down just so, laying waste to Bunyan's allegory. Balls to the celestial city, I wanted her!
I was kept ignorant, but ignorance isn't innocence. Children are not innocent in the Victorian sense of the word. They are- as we've known since Freud- seethingly sexual and- just as important- insatiably curious.
So why this obsession with keeping their little minds pure? I can only suppose that most adults have- wilfully and ignorantly- forgotten what it's like to be a child.
If there'd been an internet when I was a kid I'd have been furious to know there were walls in place to keep me "safe"- and I'd have done everything in my power to circumvent them.
I was kept ignorant, but ignorance isn't innocence. Children are not innocent in the Victorian sense of the word. They are- as we've known since Freud- seethingly sexual and- just as important- insatiably curious.
So why this obsession with keeping their little minds pure? I can only suppose that most adults have- wilfully and ignorantly- forgotten what it's like to be a child.
If there'd been an internet when I was a kid I'd have been furious to know there were walls in place to keep me "safe"- and I'd have done everything in my power to circumvent them.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-10 03:09 pm (UTC)Is it a hang up on our societal notion that sex is a "bad" thing still? Christian morality?
I feel we force children into a pure state in much the same way as we once did with women. They do not think this, they do not think that. Because we do not WANT them to be impure or knowing or anything like that we force them into being what adult society wants them to be. It's so bloody condescending.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-10 03:18 pm (UTC)But having a relationship with say a 10 year old that looks that way is morally and ethically wrong because they are not fully grown mentally, you would dominate the relationship etc.
So that kind of relationship is judged by most people to be an abuse of power.
Should a ten year old be able to have a sexual relationship with another ten year old? Again, probably no, as they still lack the knowledge to deal with this aspect of their life.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-10 03:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-10 03:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-10 07:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-10 08:10 pm (UTC)I think having a sexual relationship with a child is wrong in every way. However, children do have sexual feelings and sexual urges. I certainly did. I had fantasies and I masturbated and had orgasms well before I hit puberty. But before puberty (and even in the beginning stages of it), I was content to do all those things alone.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-10 03:42 pm (UTC)I think you're onto something when you compare our present treatment of children with the way society used to treat women. It's often said that Victorian women were "infantilised". Well, modern children are "infantilised" too.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-10 04:06 pm (UTC)BTW - I had sado-masochistic sexual fantasies when I was 6 and was masturbating at 8. I wonder how extensive these types of feelings and experiences are in children generally?
no subject
Date: 2008-10-10 08:00 pm (UTC)I think most people censor their childhood memories. I don't believe you and I were at all abnormal.