It Was The Best Butter
Oct. 2nd, 2008 12:22 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I'm not particularly fond of my younger self- and if people kept coming up to me expecting me to be just like him I'd get cross.
It must be horrid to be middle-aged and still famous for something you did when you were a gobby kid. You'd feel trapped, like you couldn't move on. It would be like carrying a corpse around.
And maybe that's the reason- aside from the money, aside from wanting to prolong his fame- why Johnny Rotten did that stupid butter ad. He wanted to ditch the cadaver.
He wanted to upset his fans.
And yes, it's always sad when a hero sells out.
Simple remedy: don't have any heroes in the first place.
It must be horrid to be middle-aged and still famous for something you did when you were a gobby kid. You'd feel trapped, like you couldn't move on. It would be like carrying a corpse around.
And maybe that's the reason- aside from the money, aside from wanting to prolong his fame- why Johnny Rotten did that stupid butter ad. He wanted to ditch the cadaver.
He wanted to upset his fans.
And yes, it's always sad when a hero sells out.
Simple remedy: don't have any heroes in the first place.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 12:30 pm (UTC)I'm sure that he needed the money, and I'm sure that there are all kinds of reasons for him as a person. And him as a person probably doesn't give a shit what other people think.
But it's really okay for fans to mourn the icon, or at least I think it is.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 12:38 pm (UTC)I hate advertising with a passion.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 12:56 pm (UTC)Sigh.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 01:34 pm (UTC)I'm making excuses for him. That's all. I think it's sad he's been trapped by his own image.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 04:38 pm (UTC)Pity he has to descend to a butter advert, though.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 05:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 06:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 01:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 01:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 01:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 04:45 pm (UTC)It's just that nowadays people think heroes who put their pants on one leg at a time have feet of clay and are failing as heroes. Really, we don't want heroes to be human beings. We've lost the awareness our ancestors had that heroes are capable of being asses too. Look at Cuchulainn, for pete's sake, or Heracles. They weren't precisely untarnished silver 24/7/365. And yet we want our heroes to be always shiny and on their pedestals. Of course they're going to fall, being held to standards like that.
It would be nice if heroes could stay heroic all the time, but they can't, and I think deep down underneath we know it. After all, what do critics say about fictional heroes who are heroic all the time? That they're unrealistic.
It's a tough subject.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 07:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-04 10:59 pm (UTC)You're probably right. Only we do have the bad habit of looking for live heroes!
no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 06:32 pm (UTC)Maybe he just did it because he thought it was a hoot, and the money was also nice.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 07:28 pm (UTC)