Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
poliphilo: (Default)
[personal profile] poliphilo
All through the 90s I was an optimist. And a bit of a New Ager. I thought we were on the brink of something- of some big leap forward in human consciousness. I wasn't sure if it was going to happen because of scientific advance or because lots of advanced souls were reincarnating to push things along or because the aliens were about to intervene but- whatever- I had great expectations of the 21st century.

And then along came Karl Rove and people like him and stomped all over the tender young shoots.

And I went from being a starchild to a grouchy misanthrope.

A pity really.

These first seven years of the century have been pretty damn awful. 

But Rove's gone and he's gone because the mix of cynical machiavellianism and crass materialism and brain-dead religious hoodoo which he stood for has been tested and found wanting.

Is it foolish to hope for change?

If I'm lucky (?) I could have another 30 years on this planet.  That's a long time.  Please let it be about something other than stupid wars for stupid oil and the icecaps melting.

Date: 2007-08-16 01:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] michaleen.livejournal.com
I would agree, were I convinced that corruption and ignorance were relatively new developments, but I don't think they are. Mark Twain famously wrote a century ago: "It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly native criminal class except Congress". Two-hundred years ago, Thomas Jefferson wrote:
It is a melancholy truth, that a suppression of the press could not more compleatly deprive the nation of it's benefits, than is done by it's abandoned prostitution to falsehood. Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle. The real extent of this state of misinformation is known only to those who are in situations to confront facts within their knolege with the lies of the day. I really look with commiseration over the great body of my fellow citizens, who, reading newspapers, live & die in the belief, that they have known something of what has been passing in the world in their time; whereas the accounts they have read in newspapers are just as true a history of any other period of the world as of the present, except that the real names of the day are affixed to their fables. ... I will add, that the man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them; inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods & errors. He who reads nothing will still learn the great facts, and the details are all false.
Apologies for the lengthy quote; it's a personal favorite.

So, with all due respect, I disagree. Corruption and ignorance have always been with us, bundled along with the rest of the human condition. These are problems that face every attempt at good government anywhere in the world and in any epoch. I honestly believe that once we accept the idea that the US could or should be a "superpower" and that this status could or should be used wisely, we are already well on the road to empire, whether intentionally or not. Our founding fathers for the most part would have thought such ideas anathema to the principles of a healthy and free republic. Once the US went abroad in search of monsters to slay, as Madison put it, I think we sealed our doom.

Date: 2007-08-16 02:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
The reason I'm not wholly hostile to the idea of an American imperium is that I'm well aware how much we owe you for intervening in WWII.

I like the passage from Jefferson. Some things never change.

Date: 2007-08-16 07:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] michaleen.livejournal.com
That is a most gracious way of looking at it. If I remember my history correctly, the Nazis were essentially conceived at Versailles and nurtured on years of extreme economic hardship and dreams of revenge. Those conditions existed because of US intervention in the Great War, at least in part. I think most of the money wrung from the Weimar Republic flowed ultimately into US accounts. In modern terms, Hitler was essentially blowback from our taking sides in the previous war, a role for which we were paid handsomely.

The Nazis were an extraordinary circumstance that the nascent American imperium helped create. From that perspective, I don't see how you owe the US anything.

Date: 2007-08-16 08:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
That's an interesting angle on the interwar period- and one that had never occured to me before.

I'll have to think about it.

Date: 2007-08-16 09:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] michaleen.livejournal.com
And do check my memory, if interested. Seems a little shorter every year.

I have been thinking on what you said about corruption among the political class here. Since Twain had his laugh at the expense of Congress, the wily critters have embraced their criminal lifestyle, sometimes without a hint of shame. That it's as bad or worse now than in any period of our history wouldn't surprise me at all.

Profile

poliphilo: (Default)
poliphilo

December 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 34 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Dec. 27th, 2025 06:02 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios