Yet More About Ozu
Jun. 11th, 2007 10:26 amWell I had to say something about Tokyo Story, didn't I?
Until recently it was the only film of Ozu's that had any currency in the West. It makes it onto lists of "The Ten Best Movies Of All Time" and none of his other films ever do.
It's the fourth of his films I've seen. If I'd seen it first I might agree that it's his masterpiece. Having seen it fourth, I'm not so sure. It's a great film, certainly- but is it better the films that surround it? I don't think so.
Ozu's late films offer variations on a theme. They shuffle the same issues, the same actors, the same settings. They gain from being seen together.
Western critics go on and on about how Japanese Ozu is. This can be overdone. I find he makes me think of postwar British drama- specifically ( I'm sorry but I can't help it) of Coronation Street. Ozu, like his British counterparts, is dealing with family life- and the widening gap between the generations- in a traditional society recently traumatized by war- and (heh heh heh) by the impact of American popular culture.
Great directors often work again and again with the same actors. We talk of the Ford stock company, the Bergman stock company. Well, no-one had a stock company the way Ozu did. The actor Chishu Ryu appeared in all his later films- with (I think) only two exceptions. Usually he plays the male lead, but if that role wasn't available for him, Ozu would slip him in as a supporting player or extra. And what an amazing actor he is- utterly convincing as the charming, doddery old chap in Tokyo Story- even though he was only 49 at the time- and equally convincing- playing a man of his own age- as the dour, rather unlikable older brother in Early Summer.
Equally amazing is the radiant Setsuko Hara who if we weren't all so insular (and racist) would be as internationally famous as Garbo, Monroe or either of the Hepburns.
Ozu is wonderful. I need to see more......
Until recently it was the only film of Ozu's that had any currency in the West. It makes it onto lists of "The Ten Best Movies Of All Time" and none of his other films ever do.
It's the fourth of his films I've seen. If I'd seen it first I might agree that it's his masterpiece. Having seen it fourth, I'm not so sure. It's a great film, certainly- but is it better the films that surround it? I don't think so.
Ozu's late films offer variations on a theme. They shuffle the same issues, the same actors, the same settings. They gain from being seen together.
Western critics go on and on about how Japanese Ozu is. This can be overdone. I find he makes me think of postwar British drama- specifically ( I'm sorry but I can't help it) of Coronation Street. Ozu, like his British counterparts, is dealing with family life- and the widening gap between the generations- in a traditional society recently traumatized by war- and (heh heh heh) by the impact of American popular culture.
Great directors often work again and again with the same actors. We talk of the Ford stock company, the Bergman stock company. Well, no-one had a stock company the way Ozu did. The actor Chishu Ryu appeared in all his later films- with (I think) only two exceptions. Usually he plays the male lead, but if that role wasn't available for him, Ozu would slip him in as a supporting player or extra. And what an amazing actor he is- utterly convincing as the charming, doddery old chap in Tokyo Story- even though he was only 49 at the time- and equally convincing- playing a man of his own age- as the dour, rather unlikable older brother in Early Summer.
Equally amazing is the radiant Setsuko Hara who if we weren't all so insular (and racist) would be as internationally famous as Garbo, Monroe or either of the Hepburns.
Ozu is wonderful. I need to see more......
no subject
Date: 2007-06-11 01:49 pm (UTC)Duty doesn't have anything to do with whether or not your dad was a feckless drunk. And this isn't their dad who's sick, it's their mom. Confucianism doesn't give you a pass just because your parents are jerks at times.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-11 02:28 pm (UTC)But it could be argued on the other side that the parents are a blithering nuisance- turning up on the doorstep expecting to be indulged and amused. The first time the son "lets them down" is because he's been called to attend to a sick child. Now which is more important- caring for a sick child or showing one's parents the sights of Tokyo? I don't think that's too difficult a decision.
The son and daughter aren't particularly attractive people, but they have their reasons- and some of the reasons are good. When the youngest, favourite daughter- who never knew dad as a soak- gets angry with her siblings, the daughter-in-law says she mustn't judge them harshly; people do grow apart from their parents; life's like that. Well, says the youngest daughter with all the absolutism of youth, life is very disappointing.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-11 03:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-11 04:17 pm (UTC)If the parents needed him for something important it might be different, but this is just a sight-seeing tour.
It's not that he or his sister do anything terribly wrong, it's that they fail to show their parents any love. Duty is not enough.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-11 04:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-11 04:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-11 04:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-11 06:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 03:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 08:36 am (UTC)