Inherit The Wind
Feb. 25th, 2007 11:30 amInherit The Wind is a 50s play and movie that plays with the Scopes Monkey Trial of 1925 as a way of critiquing the McCarthy era. Now it looks like a prophecy of the rise of the Religious Right.
American history has this pattern that keeps repeating- like wallpaper. The far Right reaches for power, stretches too far, falls on its face.
Fascism is just too hateful and stupid to maintain itself in power. That's what history and Inherit The Wind teach. Let's hope they're right.
So far so good, but then the doubts begin.
The real trial was a publicity stunt, contrived by the city fathers to put Dayton Ohio on the map. Two celebrities- famed public speaker, William Jennings Bryan and liberal trial lawyer, Clarence Darrow- were drafted in to debate Darwinism and Revealed Religion. The defendant, Scopes, volunteered to be prosecuted for teaching Evolution in the public schools and was never in any real danger of going to jail. The play/movie jacks this up into a slugfest between progress and reaction. It presents Darrow as a wise old Obi Wan Kenobi and Bryan as an ignorant blowhard and booby. It livens things up with preachers delivering their daughters over to damnation and citizens parading the streets with burning effigies- none of which happened. The real contest was fought out in a carnival atmosphere of great goodwill, with Darrow the atheist recording afterwards that the citizens of fundamentalist Dayton had treated him with nothing but courtesy. These were gentler times in America.
William Jennings Bryan was a champion of the working man and an enemy of plutocracy and imperialism who took two runs at the Presidency. He was cultured, educated, thoughtful- and on the side of right and reason more often than not. The fictionalised Bryan proudly boasts of never having read Darwin; the real Bryan had read him and hated him for reasons which, however wrong-headed, do his heart credit. Briefly, he believed that Darwin led to Nietzsche which led to Nihilism which led to the Great War. He was a religious fundamentalist, but his fundamentalism was nuanced and not unintelligent.
Inherit the Wind is a warning about the dangers of American fascism. Fine. But it plays fast and loose with the truth. (Fellow lefties, we can do better than this!) And the way it trashes the memory of a great (and good) American is shameful. The more I think about this the more it makes me angry.
American history has this pattern that keeps repeating- like wallpaper. The far Right reaches for power, stretches too far, falls on its face.
Fascism is just too hateful and stupid to maintain itself in power. That's what history and Inherit The Wind teach. Let's hope they're right.
So far so good, but then the doubts begin.
The real trial was a publicity stunt, contrived by the city fathers to put Dayton Ohio on the map. Two celebrities- famed public speaker, William Jennings Bryan and liberal trial lawyer, Clarence Darrow- were drafted in to debate Darwinism and Revealed Religion. The defendant, Scopes, volunteered to be prosecuted for teaching Evolution in the public schools and was never in any real danger of going to jail. The play/movie jacks this up into a slugfest between progress and reaction. It presents Darrow as a wise old Obi Wan Kenobi and Bryan as an ignorant blowhard and booby. It livens things up with preachers delivering their daughters over to damnation and citizens parading the streets with burning effigies- none of which happened. The real contest was fought out in a carnival atmosphere of great goodwill, with Darrow the atheist recording afterwards that the citizens of fundamentalist Dayton had treated him with nothing but courtesy. These were gentler times in America.
William Jennings Bryan was a champion of the working man and an enemy of plutocracy and imperialism who took two runs at the Presidency. He was cultured, educated, thoughtful- and on the side of right and reason more often than not. The fictionalised Bryan proudly boasts of never having read Darwin; the real Bryan had read him and hated him for reasons which, however wrong-headed, do his heart credit. Briefly, he believed that Darwin led to Nietzsche which led to Nihilism which led to the Great War. He was a religious fundamentalist, but his fundamentalism was nuanced and not unintelligent.
Inherit the Wind is a warning about the dangers of American fascism. Fine. But it plays fast and loose with the truth. (Fellow lefties, we can do better than this!) And the way it trashes the memory of a great (and good) American is shameful. The more I think about this the more it makes me angry.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 01:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 01:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 02:34 pm (UTC)Nah, they really can't. One place the right and left have always been in lockstep solidarity is in unnuanced manipulation of the truth for the sake of political gain. The American political landscape is so depressing I'm ready to go duck hunting with the Vice President.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 04:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 04:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-25 08:11 pm (UTC)Otherwise- Oh golly gosh! as my old housemaster would have said. You're making me blush.
Many thanks, cher confrere.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 09:19 pm (UTC)But yes, Inherit the Wind did turn what had been a somewhat light-hearted publicity stunt into something far more sinister and serious than it actually had been, and is more a reflection of the mood of the 1950s than of the 1920s.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 10:08 pm (UTC)