Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
poliphilo: (Default)
[personal profile] poliphilo

So that's what Plymouth Rock looks like. 

I dunno, I 've been hearing about it all my life and had sort of imagined it as a geological feature of some size and presence.  You know, craggy, looming, extensive, grand- a promontory perhaps. 

Something along the lines of The Giant's Causeway.

And it's just a rock. A small rock. You could pick it up with a forklift. That is, if it wasn't cemented into place. 

We've got better looking rocks in our local, neighbourhood park.

Date: 2006-11-23 06:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shewhomust.livejournal.com
When I saw it - back during the first Gulf War - it had a yellow ribbon tied round it, with a big bow.

Date: 2006-11-23 10:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
Words fail.....

We've been told...

Date: 2006-11-23 06:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jubal51394.livejournal.com
We... that's us New Englanders that have grown up around there... we've been told that in 1629 it was indeed significantly larger but that people(damn those people!) have been taking home chunks of it as a souvenir for years.

Re: We've been told...

Date: 2006-11-23 10:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
Yeah, but it was never that big, was it? I mean, it was never anything more than a boulder.

Re: We've been told...

Date: 2006-11-24 02:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jubal51394.livejournal.com
I really have no clue beyond what I've been told but... how much do we think that people could chip away in 377 years?

Re: We've been told...

Date: 2006-11-24 03:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
Quite a lot, I suppose.

I've been researching the rock's long and confusing history. It's been broken several times, glued together again and moved about from place to place. It has been calculated that the upper section- which was broken off in 1775 but is now reunited with its base- is about 1/3 of its original size.

Date: 2006-11-23 06:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aint2nuts.livejournal.com
People have been taking peices of it home for over 300 years, what do you expect?

Date: 2006-11-23 10:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
Ooh- a national monument; I'll have a piece of that!
From: [identity profile] seraphimsigrist.livejournal.com
well then you may perhaps expect some
people weary of old lands and ways and
looking for a future they can make themselves
to show up any day now.
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
At the Giant's Causeway, you mean? Naah- the Causeway is in Northern Ireland and those guys hate immigrants even more than they hate one another.
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
Or our local park? Ha, it's already happened. Oldham has been an ethnic melting pot since the end of WWII. Poles, Ukranians, West Indians, Indians, Pakistanis, Bangladeshis...

Date: 2006-11-24 01:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] four-thorns.livejournal.com
as someone who's grown up in eastern massachusetts and probably first saw plymouth rock at the age of 5, i think that's hilarious. it's always been just a rock in a pit for me.

and anyway, it's supposed to be important because of the circumstances of who stepped on it and when they stepped on it, not because of any particular characteristic of the rock itself.

Date: 2006-11-24 10:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
If, of course, anyone of importance ever did step on it. I read that no-one paid it any mind until- long after the event- some very old man came up with the information that his grand-daddy had told him that this was where the Pilgrims landed.

Date: 2006-11-24 05:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] four-thorns.livejournal.com
yeah, but what matters isn't the truth, but that people believe it, don't you think? i think that's true for a lot of things.

Date: 2006-11-24 06:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
I know what you mean. I've always been entranced by Glastonbury with its Arthurian connections- even though I'm aware that the Glastonbury legend is almost certainly the invention of medieval monks cynically eager to attract pilgrims/tourists.

Date: 2006-11-24 04:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] happydog.livejournal.com
Well, they were Pilgrims. They were used to making mountains out of molehills, which as I understand it is what made them persona non grata in two countries before they came over to ruin colonize the New World.

Date: 2006-11-24 10:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
I thought of going into all that... but I'm lazy.

Yeah, I sort of subscribe to William Carlos Williams' view of the Pilgrims- that they were a pretty ghastly set of people and their influence has seriously warped the American psyche- that they were in fact a sort of 17th century Taliban.

Date: 2006-11-24 06:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] happydog.livejournal.com
...a sort of 17th century Taliban.

indeed, as evidenced by the Salem "witch trials," they were. Not to mention 12 hour church services and hymns that are among the ugliest and most tuneless ever written - purposely!

OMG....

Date: 2006-11-27 11:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] suemars.livejournal.com
that was so funny.

Re: OMG....

Date: 2006-11-28 11:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
Cheers! :)

Date: 2006-12-15 01:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kaysho.livejournal.com
I got a chuckle that the "little rock" for which Little Rock, Arkansas is named is quite a bit larger. :)

Profile

poliphilo: (Default)
poliphilo

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 23
4 5 6 7 8 910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jan. 10th, 2026 04:11 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios