3i Atlas is a very peculiar thingy that is hurrying through the solar system from a source far out in space. The original wisdom was that it was just another comet- though a very big one- but the trouble is that it's not behaving like a comet. It's such an anomaly that even the scientists- at least the bolder ones- are saying, "Could be artificial...", "Could be alien....", Could be conscious or consciously directed...." The closer it gets to us the less data is being shared with the public and- well I never- it's approach to Mars coincided with the shut-down of the US government- which includes NASA with all its probes and talking heads.
And, well, that's all really: 3i Atlas is odd, it doesn't fit with our established scientific paradigms, the boffins are brainstorming among themselves but don't want to let the rest of us in on the conversation. The psychics and channelers are having a field day....
I have nothing to say from myself. I just wanted to acknowledge here, publicly, that this is going on.....
And, well, that's all really: 3i Atlas is odd, it doesn't fit with our established scientific paradigms, the boffins are brainstorming among themselves but don't want to let the rest of us in on the conversation. The psychics and channelers are having a field day....
I have nothing to say from myself. I just wanted to acknowledge here, publicly, that this is going on.....
no subject
Date: 2025-10-14 02:51 pm (UTC)One particularly unusual feature of 3I/ATLAS is that it appears as though its tail points toward the Sun. Normally, comet tails point away from the Sun due to solar radiation pressure, and 3I/ATLAS does have a faint tail like this.
Trajectory of 3I/ATLAS to Earth
Object Date
Mars 2025-Oct-03
Sun 2025-Oct-29
Venus 2025-Nov-03
Earth 2025-Dec-19
no subject
Date: 2025-10-14 03:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-10-14 03:21 pm (UTC)Astronomer Samantha Lawler highlighted that "while it is important to remain open-minded about any 'testable prediction', the new paper [by Loeb et al.] pushes this sentiment to the limit." Lawler further said that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, while "the evidence presented [by Loeb et al.] is absolutely not extraordinary.