I Don't Understand
Aug. 13th, 2006 06:03 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I was reading an article on Lebanese politics and after a while I gave up because I was reading the words but I didn't know what they meant.
For example: Druze. I know the Druze are a religious grouping, but I don't know what the content is. I could look it up in Wikipedia, I suppose, but still I wouldn't really know. I lack the cultural experience to be able, even dimly, to understand what it must feel like to be Druze.
And the same goes for Sunni, Shia, Maronite, Hezbollah....
Cultural experience is everything. I can form a dim idea of what it might feel like to belong to the Provisional IRA because IRA members and I share a certain amount of cultural experience. I understand rainy northern cities. I understand terraced streets and council estates. I understand fields full of cows. I understand catholic. I understand protestant. I understand Irish nationalism. I understand the British empire. And when I say "understand" what I mean is that all these concepts call up a certain emotional response in me.
But the Lebanon? No shared cultural experience, no emotional response, no understanding.
It would be nice to think that the Western leaders who are currently meddling in the Middle East have the understanding I lack but, given the results of their meddling, I doubt it.
For example: Druze. I know the Druze are a religious grouping, but I don't know what the content is. I could look it up in Wikipedia, I suppose, but still I wouldn't really know. I lack the cultural experience to be able, even dimly, to understand what it must feel like to be Druze.
And the same goes for Sunni, Shia, Maronite, Hezbollah....
Cultural experience is everything. I can form a dim idea of what it might feel like to belong to the Provisional IRA because IRA members and I share a certain amount of cultural experience. I understand rainy northern cities. I understand terraced streets and council estates. I understand fields full of cows. I understand catholic. I understand protestant. I understand Irish nationalism. I understand the British empire. And when I say "understand" what I mean is that all these concepts call up a certain emotional response in me.
But the Lebanon? No shared cultural experience, no emotional response, no understanding.
It would be nice to think that the Western leaders who are currently meddling in the Middle East have the understanding I lack but, given the results of their meddling, I doubt it.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-13 05:58 pm (UTC)I have no direct experience or link to the conflict in the Middle East, but I think to say that "cultural experience is everything" is overreaching. Without denying that it does provide critical insight, I think to adopt such a stance is to implicitly dismiss or devalue the insight/opinions of those who may not be directly involved but might very well have a comprehensive grasp on the history/sociology/politics surrounding the topic. I always used to bristle at the t-shirts that said "It's a Black thing: you wouldn't understand" because while it may have been only an attempt at ethnic pride it only served to further isolate and divide.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-13 09:03 pm (UTC)My point, I think, is that most of us, inevitably, have very little understanding of what gives in the Middle east- and I suspect that goes for quite a few of our political leaders.
Does Tony Blair know what the Druze believe and how they live? Bet he doesn't.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-13 09:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 02:16 am (UTC)The self-proclaimed anti-multiculturalists seem to have a mindset of "You will be assimilated" to whatever their particular version of American culture happens to be, so what they think of a multicultural country like Lebanon can only be imagined.
As for me, Lebanese politics are beyond me. I find it hard enough keeping up with Balkan politics, and we have people from the Balkans and people from the Near East in our church.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-13 06:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-13 09:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 01:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 02:16 pm (UTC)I suppose we'd have to debate particular examples of one country intervening in the affairs of another and then decide whether it was a good or a bad thing.
I suppose the glaring example of an intervention that has gone hideously wrong is the invasion of Iraq. I never thought this was a good idea, but I think it's demonstrable that the ignorance of the invaders has helped make a bad situation worse.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 03:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 05:09 am (UTC)lots of cultures devalue and dehumanize other people, such that their deaths mean nothing, and are even a cause for celebration. islamic fundamentalists pleased about bombing sutff- you think they don't know that they probably killed some kids in with all the adults?
no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 01:44 pm (UTC)You misunderstand me. Or perhaps I wasn't clear. I meant that no one likes to see THEIR children killed. I think that's pretty much a universal. That was just one example of what I believe is much we have in common.
Killing Other is, of course, what war is about. If you're killing Other, I'm not sure if it matters if it's children or not--in some cases, I think it probably feels better to kill children, because they may be easier targets and they won't grow up to fight you.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-13 09:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-13 09:32 pm (UTC)I guess people might have said the same thing about the religious wars in Europe in the 17th century.
Time is merciful.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-13 11:09 pm (UTC)