Keaton And Chaplin
Aug. 21st, 2005 11:01 amKeaton is Pierrot to Chaplin's Harlequin.
Keaton is beautiful. Keaton is one of the most beautiful men who ever lived.
Both these guys started out as tumblers and discovered somewhere along the line that they were artists.
Keaton's camerawork is lovely. Chaplin could never be bothered with that sort of thing.
Chaplin lived in a larger world. His films are braver. Keaton never went beyond pushing the fat capitalist in the river (then fishing him out again.) There's nothing in the Keaton oeuvre as transgressive as The Great Dictator or M. Verdoux.
Keaton did a deal with the suits (perhaps he had to) and they screwed him; Chaplin never did and they tried to screw him and failed.
Keaton is a huge talent. Chaplin is a genius.
Sam Beckett made an insufferably pretentious film with Keaton. Its insufferably pretentious title is "Film". All the way through he insists on photographing Keaton from the back. One of the greatest faces in film history and you make a point of not showing it- words fail me!
Keaton eclipses Chaplin in their scene together in Limelight and Chaplin allows it to happen. I love it.
Keaton is beautiful. Keaton is one of the most beautiful men who ever lived.
Both these guys started out as tumblers and discovered somewhere along the line that they were artists.
Keaton's camerawork is lovely. Chaplin could never be bothered with that sort of thing.
Chaplin lived in a larger world. His films are braver. Keaton never went beyond pushing the fat capitalist in the river (then fishing him out again.) There's nothing in the Keaton oeuvre as transgressive as The Great Dictator or M. Verdoux.
Keaton did a deal with the suits (perhaps he had to) and they screwed him; Chaplin never did and they tried to screw him and failed.
Keaton is a huge talent. Chaplin is a genius.
Sam Beckett made an insufferably pretentious film with Keaton. Its insufferably pretentious title is "Film". All the way through he insists on photographing Keaton from the back. One of the greatest faces in film history and you make a point of not showing it- words fail me!
Keaton eclipses Chaplin in their scene together in Limelight and Chaplin allows it to happen. I love it.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-21 05:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-21 05:15 am (UTC)I feel better now, although clearly I need more coffee this morning.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-21 05:44 am (UTC)My favorite Keaton photo.
Date: 2005-08-21 05:18 am (UTC)*grin*
Strikingly handsome -- and yes, that IS a puppy in his pocket.
Re: My favorite Keaton photo.
Date: 2005-08-21 05:45 am (UTC)That one's new to me.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-21 06:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-21 06:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-21 07:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-21 10:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-21 07:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-21 11:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-21 12:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-21 12:34 pm (UTC)Our Hospitality is a really funny movie.
I haven't seen Arbuckle since I was a kid, but I remember him as kinda over the top. Keaton was in another class.
Enjoy Limelight :)
no subject
Date: 2005-08-21 01:26 pm (UTC)i've never seen anything by either! ashamed, i am. but there's a festival running, starting tomorrow, actually: silent movie mondays: buster keaton festival (http://theparamount.com/artists/artist.asp?key=86). and i'm really thinking of going...looks like it's once a week for six weeks. i won't be able to make it to them all, but i'd like to catch at least one or two...
great post, and it reminded me that this was coming up, thanks!
no subject
Date: 2005-08-21 03:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-21 03:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-22 01:10 am (UTC)Of all the great silent comedians he's the one who feels most "modern".
no subject
Date: 2005-08-22 02:38 am (UTC)Chaplin is all about heart, which is why he can seem cloying in comparison to Keaton. For Chaplin, the comedy is a means to an end--getting the girl or beating the bad guy. For Keaton, the comedy is the end. The people provide the impetus, but you rarely think much of any Keaton character after the film is over.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-22 05:06 am (UTC)Keaton is amazing, but he doesn't engage our emotions- that's exactly right. And that's why I think Chaplin is the greater artist
But I wouldn't want to without either of them.