Change The Blueprint
Jul. 21st, 2005 10:01 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The human body is in urgent need of a re-design.
I mean, basically, it's the same monkey body we had when we first traipsed out of the woods and onto the savannahs.
It's built to last about 25 years. After which time it starts going wrong. We've quadrupled our life expectancy, but without upgrading the vehicle. And so we spend three quarters of our life-span in a body that's performing well below its best. How stupid is that?
We accept that an athlete is past it by thirty. How abject!
And it's so fragile. Why settle for skin and bone when you could have titanium?
I mean, basically, it's the same monkey body we had when we first traipsed out of the woods and onto the savannahs.
It's built to last about 25 years. After which time it starts going wrong. We've quadrupled our life expectancy, but without upgrading the vehicle. And so we spend three quarters of our life-span in a body that's performing well below its best. How stupid is that?
We accept that an athlete is past it by thirty. How abject!
And it's so fragile. Why settle for skin and bone when you could have titanium?
no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 04:38 am (UTC)My thing is arthritis. Not crippling, but it don't half slow me down.
Put me on the waiting list for a flying car.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 03:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 04:22 am (UTC)But science is wonderful. Surely someone will eventually come up with cuddly titanium.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 04:48 am (UTC)OTOH, there is something--troubling about flesh, anyway.
There's something to be said for being a ghost.
Uh-oh.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 04:53 am (UTC)But maybe we will develop new modes of sensuality. We will respond to sleekness, coldness, shine.
I just want us to get a move on. Progress is so slow.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 05:19 am (UTC)I still wonder if those big-eyed aliens are us from many eons hence, coming back to see the silly protohumans.
If that is the case, then we will have psychic brain-power but incredibly flimsy bodies.
Those big eyes are probably so they can see in the dim light of our dying star.
And no wings.
But: what if we got to reincarnate on other planets?
I wish we could have some input (this all, of course, implies a panel of judges in heaven or limbo, doesn't it?)--I would ask for a planet where we are light as feathers and float around. No cars or airplanes.
I read somewhere that the reason we humans like the look of trees and meadows best (as determined by tests) is because it's in our genes--the earliest humans loved being safe in forests and able to enjoy the grasses as well. So I would like a planet with emerald green grass and emerald green and golden forests, and a deep blue Technicolor sky.
And NO PREDATORS, including me.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 06:21 am (UTC)They've perfected time travel- and so of course they've come back to have a look.
It's good to know that the gene for curiosity isn't going to die out.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 05:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 06:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 06:18 am (UTC)It is only a matter of time before such incidents come to us as well.
I'm sorry. Such a dreadful thing.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 06:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 03:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 04:23 am (UTC)And hopefully if the head is bigger we'll be able to cram more into it.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 04:28 am (UTC)I'm just envisioning children of the future tottering around with gargantuan heads on average human frames, the weight becoming worse with age as the muscles of the neck begin to succumb to the extra burden. (Erm, yes, I do have an over-active imagination. Why do you ask?)
no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 04:47 am (UTC)The people of the future will be exquisitely proportioned robotic giants!
no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 04:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 04:46 am (UTC)I feel really cobbled together at this point. I envy those people in science fiction books who download themselves into computers so that their essence is in bytes and they can roam the universe.
If we could do things over, rewrite our evolution, I'd really like to have wings. Although by now I suspect my feathers would be falling out. Figures.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 04:50 am (UTC)Me too. I want to be downloaded into a new body. One that will be eternally 25 years old.
OK, it's not doable now, but it will be. I'm sure of it!
no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 05:10 am (UTC)I want to be me, not just an unknowing part of God--if I'm part of God, wonderful! But what if I don't know?
no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 06:41 am (UTC)The point is to know, to understand.
That's been the whole forward drive of evolution- towards a creature that can understand the universe its a part of.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 07:23 am (UTC)If--a big if one "believes" in process theology (and it is fun to play with the idea of God evolving through us), then it's just a small leap to think that, in the same way we wish as children to shrink down and be able to go inside our dollhouses, or see the world as ants might, God might want to experience the universe (this one realm at least) as those who inhabit it do.
Then, at the end (as we have said many times here), all our Vital Essence and growth is dumped into the great Energy cauldron, and is absorbed back into God, who uses it to learn.
Simplistic, I know. And probably wrong: more and more I am convinced that God isn't a pinpoint Being (like us), but all of this. And--to leap to Pantentheism--hopefully more than "all this."
I used to think, if God can make the universe, what ELSE (beyond imagining) can God do?
Is this it?
no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 11:06 am (UTC)Someone said he reckoned that the universe was not only stranger than we think, but stranger than we CAN think.
Theology is an art form, not a science. It paints pictures
no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 11:30 am (UTC)Exactly. I like that.
I've read too many books. I expect--demand--an ending which will reveal everything.
You know those star-fields showing multiple galaxies against a black background? When I look at them I think of the corpuscles in our veins, and how if we were small enough our location would seem vast and we could begin to think we were in a universe of corpuscle galaxies.
Maybe we're in a vast body known as God.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 05:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 06:44 am (UTC)so far we've progressed to the point where we can reinforce a leg. One day we'll be able to replace the whole shooting match.
I can't get past...
Date: 2005-07-21 07:01 am (UTC)Re: I can't get past...
Date: 2005-07-21 07:24 am (UTC)Same thing.
Re: I can't get past...
Date: 2005-07-21 07:49 am (UTC)Re: I can't get past...
Date: 2005-07-21 11:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 10:30 am (UTC)So much of what was once thought of as Science Fiction has come to pass, I always wonder if one of the reasons why is that 'that' caught the eye of some young soon to be inventor. Remember the communicators on the FIRST Star Trek? Today's cell phones are very much like them...
So, if 'they' could make a Data, why does a better model human have to be titanium?
Just a question.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 10:31 am (UTC)A rather Freudian slip, I meant fully functional.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 11:17 am (UTC)I remember that episode. Yes indeed I do. I'm not sure it wasn't the very first I saw.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 11:16 am (UTC)But, no, you're probably right. We'll be able to produced something that looks like flesh but is very much tougher and- of course- disease-proof.
There are people out there trying to make humanoid robots. I don't think they're all that far-advanced yet, but I'm sure they'll get to Data eventually.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 11:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 12:12 pm (UTC)At present replacement parts are, generally speaking, inferior to the originals- but I don't suppose it'll be long before reality catches up with the comic books and we'll be creating bionic supermen and superwomen.