Plagiarism
Jun. 1st, 2005 10:09 amSomeone just plagiarised a couple of sentences from my last post. They dressed 'em up a bit, but I know my own children.
It's a compliment, right?
I'm not cross (well, not very) and part of me is flattered. Since neither of us is making money out of this I don't regard it as any big deal. I just want the person that did it to know I know.
Dude, the convention is to put "borrowed" material in quotation marks and to give the original author credit.
Still, I'm easy. None of the stuff on this blog is copyrighted. And maybe (who knows?) there are other people out there taking credit for what I've done. I'm not a professional writer or photographer. My philosophy with this blog is that I'm putting messages in bottles and casting them out to sea. What happens next is up to wind and wave and ocean current.
It's a compliment, right?
I'm not cross (well, not very) and part of me is flattered. Since neither of us is making money out of this I don't regard it as any big deal. I just want the person that did it to know I know.
Dude, the convention is to put "borrowed" material in quotation marks and to give the original author credit.
Still, I'm easy. None of the stuff on this blog is copyrighted. And maybe (who knows?) there are other people out there taking credit for what I've done. I'm not a professional writer or photographer. My philosophy with this blog is that I'm putting messages in bottles and casting them out to sea. What happens next is up to wind and wave and ocean current.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 04:51 am (UTC)It was someone who's there on my flist, but with whom I've had minimal contact.
*paranoia*
Date: 2005-06-01 05:00 am (UTC)looking at my last post, your last post, nothing is jumping out ... oddly panicked just the same.
the mind is a terrible thing.
Re: *paranoia*
Date: 2005-06-01 05:07 am (UTC)This was a blatant steal, not an accidental echo or anything like that. The "borrower" has inserted some guff of his/her own into my sentences but otherwise kept word order and phraseology the same.
Re: *paranoia*
Date: 2005-06-01 05:55 am (UTC)Re: *paranoia*
Date: 2005-06-01 06:22 am (UTC)LJ is all about bouncing ideas around. And it's inevitable there's going to be a lot of echoing. We're building something together (what it is we don't quite know) "you in your small corner, and I in mine."
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 06:31 am (UTC)And no, it wasn't you.
I guess we all read so much of one another's work that every once in a while we're liable to help ourselves to an idea, a phrase, quite innocently, thinking we've originated it.
But this wasn't like that. This person took too much and copied too slavishly.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 07:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 07:45 am (UTC)I've never given the phenomenon much thought before. I guess it's a lot more prevalent than I believed.
I've just been over to Amazon to take a look at the books you cite. Apparently there's a whole literature on plagiarism. Apparently Academia is plagued by it. Apparently Martin Luther King Jr was a serial plagiarist. My mind reels.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 09:14 am (UTC)I can't get over MLK. I knew he had his weaknesses, but...
I mean, there he was, the most famous man in the world (more or less) with thousands of enemies all waiting for him to make a slip and he gave them ammunition by doing this. Was it a compulsive thing? Or was it, as seems to be the case with many public figures, that he liked to flirt with danger?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 06:43 am (UTC)If it were me, I'd be really pissed, but I DO write for a living.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 07:20 am (UTC)Why bother?
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 07:02 am (UTC)I haven't written much of anything lately, but if it was me, I apologize.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 07:15 am (UTC)It was a person way out on the badlands of my flist.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 07:20 am (UTC)Whew.
I tend to pick up on people's writing rhythms, and it worries me sometimes because I do tend to "echo back" their style a bit.
In high school I used to read Dickens to get his rhythms rolling in my head before I wrote.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 07:27 am (UTC)Robert Louis Stevenson said he learned to write by playing "the sedulous ape" to a range of classic authors. I love that phrase.
The writer whose prose style I aped was G.K. Chesterton- a very bad model to choose- very distinctive, very mannered. It took me a lot of hard work to rid myself of his cadences.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 07:32 am (UTC)(I knew it wasn't me, but I hicupped anyway: I leap to guilt.)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 07:27 am (UTC)If they were going to do it as some sort of meme, it would be nice of them to link back. Heck, the phrase 'shamelessly stolen from X' is a common one at LJ.
I knew it wasn't me because I doubt you'd be contacted by your ex and were requesting brownies as a result, but I checked anyway.
(I sometimes hunt down old posts of mine on another board, another name... it's another life. What an odd stranger she is.)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 07:55 am (UTC)No it wasn't a meme or anything like. It was a sentence or two of mine not so cunningly woven into a paragraph of theirs.
Strange. But thanks to what
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 09:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 08:17 am (UTC)See, now I'm suffering major deja vu from reading your post, because I know I have seen it somewhere before but I don't recall where. Oddly enough, it's probably from reading your post several times. It's deja vu-ing itself now.
Still, I'm sorry someone swiped your words without permission or citation. Our words are our credit in this online community, makig plagiarism more of a theft here than elsewhere.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 09:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 08:14 am (UTC)I've often written something fairly nice and thought "oh wait, did I create that or did I take it from somewhere else?". Sometimes I've found that when it feels like words just belong in a particlar order it's because I read them in that order by the original author. You read something good and it sticks with you, and there are unfortunate cases of inadvertant recycling.
As George Carlin said (more or less) "What do they mean when they say 'in your own words?'. Do you have your own words? I've been using the same ones as everyone else."
(I can't google the exact quote for that line. Ironic, really.)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 03:20 pm (UTC)And I'm all for imitation of structures - I don't see why using "just as...so..." should be bad at all (although it's a bit archaic for, say, an informational brochure).
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 08:00 am (UTC)PS. Most times it'd probably be me - 's never happened yet, but I'm terrified it's going to happen someday. I swear, I have this completely worthless capacity to get words stuck in my head the way other people get song stuck in their heads. Upside is, I can quote vast swathes of poetry; downside is every time I say something I have to reread it to make sure I haven't accidentally quoted someone I just spoke to a couple hours ago, or something.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 09:20 am (UTC)I think anyone who loves words is in danger of unconscious plagiarism- we've got so many of them swirling around our heads. Walter de la Mare has a story about how, entirely by accident, he largely misappropriated a friend's poem about an owl.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 08:05 pm (UTC)I think everyone thinks it's them. It's not me, is it
What a mess! I dealt with this sort of thing on Diaryland once. Someone on LJ took an ENTIRE poem and published it as theirs. I went ballistic. It wasn't even that important. I don't know what it was, but I felt extremely violated. After that, I never posted anything that I considered even mildly worth literary merit.
Really, it's not that I am not longer a great writer [laughs] I am just paranoid.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 01:53 am (UTC)A whole poem? that's serious plagiarism. I have left myself very open to this. I've posted quite a lot of "literary" stuff without even putting my name to it. I guess I knew I'd get ripped off sooner or later, but I suppressed the information.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 05:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-03 03:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 08:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 09:25 am (UTC)Bravissimo!
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 10:09 am (UTC)You win for a month!
You clever thing, you.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 01:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 11:10 am (UTC)But that sucks. I mean, even if it doesn't bother you, people should be creative enough to think of those things on their own. At least putting it in as a quote would be flattery without the lifting/stealing part :\
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 11:40 am (UTC)Yeah, plagiarism is pretty low-down, but it seems there's a lot of it going on.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 01:39 am (UTC)I've always wondered about Lennon's "So this is Christmas". It shares its tune with a folk song about a racehorse- Stewball or Skewball or something like that. Was this plagiarism or did Lennon honestly think he'd made it up himself?
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 11:50 am (UTC)Certainly an accident. Kind of like George Harrison's run in about "He's So Fine/My Sweet Lord.
But...deliberate?
We have new software here at the l.s. so we can run papers received through and make sure that everything is properly credited and so forth...
So sad.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 12:48 pm (UTC)IT seems a bit freaky to have one's words plagerised. I suppose when they are on the public domain they are no longer yours (the chief reason why I only write light stuff in mine) but still! Not even quotation marks.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 01:43 am (UTC)This person didn't use question marks. They just inserted my sentences into a paragraph of their own.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 03:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 01:41 am (UTC)