Top Of The World
May. 25th, 2005 10:27 amWe started seeing gorse by the roadside. That could only mean one thing- sea breezes. Then we arrived at the top of the world and there, about ten miles away, at the edge of a shining plain, was the Irish sea.
I took pictures. but distant vistas never photograph well. It's all in your head- the romance of the pearl-grey mist. You can't capture it in pixels.
Over to the far right- at the corner of the frame as it were- stood a group of huge blocky buildings. Ailz said it was the nuclear power plant at Sellafield.
It used to be called Windscale. Then there was a big fuck-up (or several big fuck-ups- I forget the details) and they changed the name.
I don't know about nuclear power. I was reading an article by Lovelock, the Gaia man, and he was saying that nuclear power is the future, whether we like it or not. Wind farms are pretty to look at but they're not efficient. If we want to keep our civilisation going (do we?) it's nukes or nothing.
And it set me thinking how there can't be any progress without risk.
There were lots of skrikey birds at the top of the world. The black and white ones I tentatively identified as peewits and the ones with thin hooky beaks I identified as curlews. I guess they had nests nearby and didn't like it that we'd stopped the car and were looking about.
Rise and dive, flutter, flap, skrikety-skrike. "Bugger off, or I'll take your eye out!"
I took pictures. but distant vistas never photograph well. It's all in your head- the romance of the pearl-grey mist. You can't capture it in pixels.
Over to the far right- at the corner of the frame as it were- stood a group of huge blocky buildings. Ailz said it was the nuclear power plant at Sellafield.
It used to be called Windscale. Then there was a big fuck-up (or several big fuck-ups- I forget the details) and they changed the name.
I don't know about nuclear power. I was reading an article by Lovelock, the Gaia man, and he was saying that nuclear power is the future, whether we like it or not. Wind farms are pretty to look at but they're not efficient. If we want to keep our civilisation going (do we?) it's nukes or nothing.
And it set me thinking how there can't be any progress without risk.
There were lots of skrikey birds at the top of the world. The black and white ones I tentatively identified as peewits and the ones with thin hooky beaks I identified as curlews. I guess they had nests nearby and didn't like it that we'd stopped the car and were looking about.
Rise and dive, flutter, flap, skrikety-skrike. "Bugger off, or I'll take your eye out!"
no subject
Date: 2005-05-25 03:08 am (UTC)I love this
"Rise and dive, flutter, flap, skrikety-skrike. "Bugger off, or I'll take your eye out!"
no subject
Date: 2005-05-25 03:13 am (UTC)I'll do my best. :)
no subject
Date: 2005-05-25 03:15 am (UTC)Ah, so refreshing to hear someone say this! Most people gripe about them because they 'spoil' the view. You get massive NIMBY-based protests whenever a proposal is mooted to set some up in a particular area.
But I'm with you - I agree that they look pretty, like gigantic versions of the windmills some people put in their gardens. They are sleek and slim-lined and elegant. Plus, even if they're not perfectly efficient, each majestically rotating windmill represents one small reduction in the amount carbon being poured out into the atmosphere by fossil fuels. If that's not beautiful to look upon, I'd like to know what is.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-25 03:58 am (UTC)Why aren't they being sold to us as art?
no subject
Date: 2005-05-25 04:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-25 04:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-25 05:05 am (UTC)I bet Dutch and Suffolk Windmills were seen as ugly when they were built...
no subject
Date: 2005-05-25 06:04 am (UTC)We are upset by the unfamiliar. It's the whole modern art syndrome. But once we've familarised ourselves with a building/sculpture/industrial installation we start to love it.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-25 06:39 am (UTC)It is a shame that it seems there can be no other *method* besides nuclear power. Solar power is iffy, windpower is iffy...what has humankind done to itself that the powers of nature can't be harnessed?
We have kingfishers and swallowtails at the cottage. Of course, that's freshwater...
no subject
Date: 2005-05-25 07:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-25 06:51 am (UTC)Who needs photographs when one can read such beautiful prose?
no subject
Date: 2005-05-25 07:44 am (UTC)It was an amazing place.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-25 09:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-25 10:53 am (UTC)We think old windmills (the Don Quixote kind) are marvellously picturesque. The only difference between those and these is scale and streamlining.