Glenda Jackson

[poliphilo]

Introducing a sketch from The Morecambe and Wise Show last night, Penelope Keith explained- I suppose because it was thought necessary- that Glenda Jackson was once a very big star indeed. The sketch- featuring Jackson as Cleopatra- included a running joke about the Oscar she won for Women in Love.

Jackson belongs to that itchy and scratchy generation of post-war actors who found their chosen career unserious. Where many of her male contemporaries- like Peter O'Toole and her co-star Oliver Reed- diluted their talent with drink, she- like Vanessa Redgrave and Jane Fonda- pursued a parallel career in left-wing politics. In 1992 she quit acting altogether to stand for parliament, trading stardom for a career of relative obscurity as junior minister and back-bencher, punctuated by occasional, high-profile, episodes of windmill-tilting. Had she stayed where she was there'd have been no need to gloss her name for a contemporary TV audience and Judy Dench's late career surge might never have happened- because who would have offered Dench those iconic roles of hers if Jackson- with two Oscars under her belt- had  still been available?

I refuse to say, "what a waste", because who knows what private karma Jackson needed to work out or what satisfactions she has enjoyed in her later life but it's hard not to regret the body of work she chose not to give us.

Comments

[ingenious76.livejournal.com]

Post war guilt, perhaps? That they'd survived one of the biggest horrors the world had seen, and were able to do a career that some would regard as trivial?

Or - that they were addicts, pure and simple. And let's face it, acting is one career that is an enabler. Late nights, irregular work, stardom, isolation, loneliness. And the benefit that they were stars when being an actor was seen as mysterious and untochable, unlike today's world where I can tweet people I've just seen in the cinema.

Can I cheekily add you missed Marlon Brando? Pretty much all of the post-60s US actors have aped Brando - from Sean Penn to Stallone. And he went mad. Jack Nicholson, on the other hand, has also drink 'n drugged n' shagged his way through life, but somehow he's stayed relatively in tact. I suspect its because Jack is the kind of man who gets how ridiculous Hollywood is, and rather than getting mournful, joins us in laughing at it.

[poliphilo.livejournal.com]

I agree with everything you say in the first two paragraphs.

I left Brando out for a couple of reasons. Firstly because I don't like his work (it's as if he's always acting into a mirror) and secondly because his decline was untypical. The other guys got hung up on booze but what exactly did Brando get hung up on- himself, perhaps? As you say, he went mad.

Nicholson is a great pro. He likes a laff but he's never lost sight of his craft. Give him the opportunity and he'll seize it. He's never done anything to sabotage his career.

[ingenious76.livejournal.com]

Nicholson is a brilliant actor. Whilst much is made of him being The Joker and his role as the Devil in Witches of Eastwick, I thought he was at his best in About Schmidt and The Pledge - two roles that really showed how subtle he is.

[poliphilo.livejournal.com]

Yes, he's best known for the big razzle-dazzle roles, which he can probably do without breaking sweat, but he's actually an actor of considerable range- and one who's happy to play unshowy roles in small movies when he believes in them.

[ingenious76.livejournal.com]

The Pledge is quite, quite brilliant. His performance as a man who loses everything had me riveted.

[davesmusictank.livejournal.com]

I would happily agree with that synopsis. Also, technology has made actors more visible even when they are not working.

[ingenious76.livejournal.com]

There are a few actors who I suspect would have no career now if the drinking, drugging, behaviour of their teens/twenties had been made available on social media - Drew Barrymore and Robert Downey Jr spring to mind. Compare them - both sober, successful, still working to Lindsay Lohan, whose career is essentially dead in the water, aside from crap TV movies. Barrymore openly admits she was snorting cocaine at 16, whilst Downey Jr spent time in chokey.

However...Corey Haim was a drug user in the 80s, and died broke, alone, and depressed in a crappy part of LA a couple of years ago. Perhaps the biggest difference is Barrymore/Downey can both act.

[poliphilo.livejournal.com]

Downey's misfortunes weren't any secret. I remember the gossip columns being full of them. And a prison term can't exactly be hidden. Same with Barrymore. I don't think wild behaviour has ever been a hindrance to an actor's career. The profession has always had its hell-raisers. What matters is the work- and if the work isn't affected who cares? As you say, Downey and Barrymore have come through- and still have careers- because they're both of them extremely talented, charismatic performers.