Women Writers
Sep. 28th, 2013 02:22 pmSome Canadian academic has caused an international furore by saying he doesn't like women writers so he isn't going to teach them.
Fair enough. I wouldn't want to be taught by anyone who hated their subject.
Mind you, I wouldn't want to be taught by him at all. He'd set my teeth on edge.
It made me think about my own reading habits. Right now I'm majoring on female authors. My favourite classic is Charlotte Bronte and the modern novels I'm reading are mostly by women. I particularly like A.S. Byatt, Hilary Mantel, Sarah Waters and Kate Atkinson. I'm halfway through a book by Ali Smith and I've got something by Rose Tremain lined up. Ailz says women authors are better at getting into their characters' heads. That's a bit sweeping, but I think women on the whole (there are always exceptions) are better at getting inside men's heads than men are at getting inside women's. Too many male authors don't look much beyond their female characters' chest measurements.
Fair enough. I wouldn't want to be taught by anyone who hated their subject.
Mind you, I wouldn't want to be taught by him at all. He'd set my teeth on edge.
It made me think about my own reading habits. Right now I'm majoring on female authors. My favourite classic is Charlotte Bronte and the modern novels I'm reading are mostly by women. I particularly like A.S. Byatt, Hilary Mantel, Sarah Waters and Kate Atkinson. I'm halfway through a book by Ali Smith and I've got something by Rose Tremain lined up. Ailz says women authors are better at getting into their characters' heads. That's a bit sweeping, but I think women on the whole (there are always exceptions) are better at getting inside men's heads than men are at getting inside women's. Too many male authors don't look much beyond their female characters' chest measurements.
no subject
Date: 2013-09-28 01:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-09-28 01:36 pm (UTC)I wonder if he anticipated the storm he's raised.
no subject
Date: 2013-09-28 03:50 pm (UTC)If one accepts this, the question then becomes why. Is it a) because women are "naturally" more empathetic, or b) because (living in a patriarchy) they have to observe, understand and anticipate male behaviour more expertly than men are obliged to observe women, or c) because (this being a patriarchy) men's motivations and experience are much more widely aired and discussed. Or some mixture of the above?
no subject
Date: 2013-09-28 03:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-09-28 03:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-09-28 04:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-09-28 05:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-09-28 05:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-09-28 10:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-09-28 04:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-09-28 05:33 pm (UTC)Though the feminist critics had a real grievance. The canon was- and still is- dominated by men. It's not unusual, for example to come across discussions of (say) the modern novel in which only male authors are named.
Just dropped by to say:
Date: 2013-09-28 09:05 pm (UTC)b) A.S. Byatt and Susan Hill were on this week's reading list
and
c) Did this man get the attention he wanted? An academic troll is still a troll.
Re: Just dropped by to say:
Date: 2013-09-29 08:03 am (UTC)I'm not that keen on Hill- though The Woman in Black is a cracking ghost story.
Who knows what he wanted? If it was 15 minutes of fame he's had it.
Love to Push!
no subject
Date: 2013-09-29 02:04 am (UTC)And thank you.
no subject
Date: 2013-09-29 08:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-09-29 08:22 pm (UTC)"She said, you don't read women authors do you? At least that's what I think I heard her say
I said how would you know and what would it matter anyway?
She said, you just don't seem like you do. I said, you're way wrong.
She said which ones have you read then? Said, read Erica Jong"
no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 08:11 am (UTC)