So now our journals are being rated in terms of topness. Mine started at 310 yesterday (or was it the day before?) and has been on the slide ever since. It currently stands at 331.
I've no objection to LJ flailing around and trying to become Facebook, if only it would give people the option of Switching It All Off and going back to the old ways.
Trying to catch up with Facebook seems utterly pointless to me. LJ offers another kind of service. It shouldn't be competing, just trying to do what it does as well as it possibly can.
no subject
Date: 2013-06-27 09:02 am (UTC)I've no objection to LJ flailing around and trying to become Facebook, if only it would give people the option of Switching It All Off and going back to the old ways.
no subject
Date: 2013-06-27 10:49 am (UTC)