The Village; Episode II
Apr. 8th, 2013 11:39 amNo-one is coping very well: the people at the big house are losing their grip, the girl who came breezing in like the spirit of the 20th century is turning into a self-righteous teetotalitarian, her father, the Methodist minister, is preaching pacifism. the poor- brutalized and brutal- are some of them mocking religion and some of them subjecting a supposed rapist to rough music, backed up with scythes and pitchforks. An old order is twisting and buckling under the pressure of modernity. If this is "lefty nonsense"- as Christoper Stevens says it is in The Mail- then Thomas Hardy is lefty nonsense too. I think The Mail and those it serves are un-nerved by the Village. They're unused to its palette-knife wielding bravura; it's too strong for their tastes- too much like Art. It's handing the British people their history back- unprettified, un-Fellowesed- and history is tricky, unstable stuff.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-08 11:30 am (UTC)The poor aren't that brutalised and brutal,are they? The chap at the head of the lynch mob is a thriving farmer who wants to get his hands on the drunkard's farm and the kids have plenty of spare sixpences for his son's little scams.
The big house people are cartoonish - smug MP, dim-witted factory owner, vicious old matriarch, neurotic daughter with a taste for working class cock, lying housemaid. The Inspector who called was interesting, but again, not very convincing. The hanging / cow purchasing / baby-popping out bit was all a bit hurried and laughable.
The women are like something out of a bargain basement Hardy, with shades of gorgeous, pouting, witless Tess. They are either in the bath, floating around in their nighties or standing by their man. Even the feminist stomps about in a magnificent corset, flicking her unconvincingly loose hair about.
It certainly doesn't live up to the comparison with Heimat, sadly. Last week's was quite promising. It seems such a waste of good talent.
As for those served by the Mail - it's advertisers and all the women who read it (more women buy it than any other paper, and more ethnic minority women by a massive margin), I doubt they give a toss. They'll all be waiting for the next series of Downtown, surely?
It's a lot less challenging - and left-leaning, I'd say - than Upstairs Downstairs
no subject
Date: 2013-04-08 11:44 am (UTC)The Mail may be read by huge numbers of women (and me) but by "those it serves" I meant a governing class (conservative with a small and large "C") that doesn't want anyone rocking the boat.
I agree about The Village not being particularly "lefty". I'm surprized anyone should think it is. I believe it operates outside the comfort zone of politics as usual.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-08 11:58 am (UTC)I know what you meant about the Mail as a vehicle for C/conservative vews, but don't think it - or any of the Fourth Estate now- serves the governing class. It's more likely to be courted by them.
The Times is deeply anti-Cameron, at the moment. All the righter-wing press is just waiting for there to be a ring for Boris to throw his hat into.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-08 12:25 pm (UTC)Boris might win an election. He's just about the only politician we have who comes across as a proper human being. I have doubts about his competence, though.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-08 12:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-08 02:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-08 05:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-08 06:26 pm (UTC)