Ghost photo
Dec. 31st, 2004 12:24 pmMost photographs of "ghosts" are unconvincing. They show "orbs"- which could be illuminated dust motes- or light anomalies- which could be anything.
But here's one I hadn't seen before which deserves closer inspection. Of course you have to trust in the good faith of the sponsors when they say it isn't a fake.
But it's oddness is compelling. If I were faking a "ghost photograph" I don't think I'd have come up with anything quite as peculiar as this.
http://paranormal.about.com/library/graphics/boothill_ghost_lg.jpg
But here's one I hadn't seen before which deserves closer inspection. Of course you have to trust in the good faith of the sponsors when they say it isn't a fake.
But it's oddness is compelling. If I were faking a "ghost photograph" I don't think I'd have come up with anything quite as peculiar as this.
http://paranormal.about.com/library/graphics/boothill_ghost_lg.jpg
no subject
Date: 2004-12-31 07:06 am (UTC)Is that in Fort?
As for the Holzer book, it's now in pb and is very inexpensive--$15--considering that it's 750-something pages long.
It's nicely spooky, written mostly in the 50s in an old-fashioned ghost-story style.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-31 07:12 am (UTC)I'm a little suspicious. Britain has been intensively farmed for hundreds of years and there are still plenty of earthworks left.
I'll have to visit Amazon and see if I can pick up a Holzer