Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
poliphilo: (Default)
[personal profile] poliphilo
The papping of the Duchess of Cambridge is clearly a matter of public interest but should it really be the headline story on a day when western embassies are going up in smoke all over the Middle East?

Date: 2012-09-14 05:08 pm (UTC)
ext_37604: (Default)
From: [identity profile] glitzfrau.livejournal.com
It's not a bloody matter of public interest. It's gross and wrong, but it is hardly worthy of any headline, let alone, as you say, a top headline on a day like this. Bloody oxygen-sucking royals.

Date: 2012-09-14 05:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
"Bloody oxygen-sucking royals" Yes, indeed.

Date: 2012-09-14 05:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] daisytells.livejournal.com
Why is the media making a circus out of the dignity of the Duchess of Cambridge? Topless sunbathing on a rooftop is done in many parts of the world where there is sunshine enough. Why should Duchess Kate not avail herself of continental sunshine? I also disapproved of the "friend" of Prince Harry who sold the party photos of the Prince to the yellow journalists. Some things are just wrong. I also have noted, on the same theme, that the media is giving far too much ink to whomever was wearing a "revealing" skirt or top. I thought those days had gone by long ago. My words to the press? "Quit it!"

Date: 2012-09-14 05:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] haikujaguar.livejournal.com
I seem to recall Depeche Mode writing a song about that in the 80's? "Princess Di is wearing a new dress..."

Date: 2012-09-14 06:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
It's trivial stuff. The Duchess sunbathes in the nude. Big deal. It raises the issues of privacy and press intrusion, but they're fairly trivial too, I think, in the scale of things.

Date: 2012-09-14 06:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
She wore a lot of new dresses, as I remember- each one of them a headline.

Date: 2012-09-14 10:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ideealisme.livejournal.com
The appropriate reaction is probably one recorded from a man in the street when asked about Prince Edward's engagement to Sophie Rees-Whatsit: "I cannot overcome my overwhelming indifference."

Date: 2012-09-15 08:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
I like that.

Date: 2012-09-15 05:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ooxc.livejournal.com
Surely it's not the sunbathing/toplessness that's a problem - it's people (not just royalty) being photographed without their knowledge - like the fuss that went on about Google Streets, until the complaint system was put in place. Also, it's particularly shocking in France, where (I'm told) privacy laws are even stricter than in the UK

Date: 2012-09-15 05:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
Yes, it's the intrusion that's the issue.

Date: 2012-09-16 02:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] michaleen.livejournal.com
A tempest in a B cup, really, and just the sort of vulgarity one should expect from ersatz royals. A real princess, like Caroline of Monaco, would -- and did -- bear her breast with grace and pride.

On the positive side, we can no longer number Kate among the utterly useless rich, since she's at least proven good for a cheap thrill on a slow day.

Profile

poliphilo: (Default)
poliphilo

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 23
4 5 6 7 8 910
1112 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 2021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jan. 20th, 2026 03:22 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios