Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
poliphilo: (Default)
[personal profile] poliphilo
TV executives in the 60s had yet to discover you could arc a storyline over several seasons. Every episode of a show was a stand alone drama. It needed a touch of romance, but the romance had to be done and dusted within forty minutes. James Kirk wasn't so much a Lothario, as the  victim of a TV trope. He loved all those women truly and sincerely and was devastated when circumstances beyond his control forced him to leave them behind. Then between episodes someone pushed the reset button and he forgot all about them. He wasn't unique in this. Every TV hero had a similarly bumpy love life.  What happened in an episode stayed within an episode.  Our heroes had their hearts broken, underwent trauma, did things that would scar any normal human being for life,  then popped up again next week as innocent as ever.  TV cowboys got caught up in more gunfights and killed more people than Wyatt Earp, Wild Bill Hickcock and Billy the Kid combined yet never lost their deep-rooted aversion to violence. 

Date: 2011-10-04 09:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] michaleen.livejournal.com
Those last two sentences are most appropriate in this case. Gene Roddenberry began doing TV westerns. His great innovation was translating his horse operas into space operas.

I have mixed feelings about James Tiberius Kirk. On the whole, I much prefer Picard, cold and bloodless as he was. Much more realistic portrayal of a ship's captain, I think.

Date: 2011-10-04 10:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
I always preferred Spock, but Kirk was OK. I think Shatner deserves enormous credit for taking a run-of-the mill, two-fisted, all American hero and making him interesting.

Patrick Stewart is a great actor. It shows.

Date: 2011-10-04 12:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davesmusictank.livejournal.com
I must admit i do prefer the Picard years to the Shatner version. Being a bit of a trekkie i also enjoyed the Benjamin years (DS9) and Captain Janeway. I was less sure about the Enterpise franchise.It did not feel quite the same.

Date: 2011-10-04 12:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] halfmoon-mollie.livejournal.com
Shatner thinks he deserves enormous credit, and is more than willing to give it to himself. Ad nauseum.

I liked Scott Bakula on Enterprise, and I liked Patrick Stewart. And you're wrong, there was more than one 'continued next week' ep of Star Trek, TOS.

"For the Earth is a Hollow Place, and I have touched the sky."

Date: 2011-10-04 12:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] halfmoon-mollie.livejournal.com
I very much enjoyed Enterprise, and had it been allowed to continue, was settling down into something pretty cool. I liked Captain Janeway, but that series never quite knew what to do with Chacotay. And of course, after awhile it became all about Seven of Nine. I found the characters on DS9 interesting, especially Doctor Basheer (but then, I am female and he is gorgeous...) I can't imagine that Gene Roddenberry had any idea he was founding a dynasty with TOS.

Date: 2011-10-04 01:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
I'd forgotten about the two-part episodes, but I think my point about long story arcs remains valid.

The world would be poorer without the unique phenomenon that is William Shatner. :)

Date: 2011-10-04 01:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
DS9 is under-rated. It had some lovely characters. Voyager I liked less and Enterprise not at all.

Date: 2011-10-04 01:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] haikujaguar.livejournal.com
We are re-watching TOS, so this is timely!

What strikes me most is that Shatner, Nimoy and Kelley were much better actors than I remember them being. Shatner in particular; we mock his mannerisms, but he was charming, in-character and threw himself into the role. He really is Kirk.

I am reminded of a friend in acting school who had an assignment to record some people's voices and then learn to mimic them, and then give a monologue to the class in that voice. She asked to do my voice, and told me later that afterwards no one in class--professor included--believed that anyone could talk that way. So she played them the tape and they said, "Wow, you were spot-on. How weird."

Some people really... DO! Talk... that way! And Kirk is completely believable to me. :)

Also, the chemistry between those three actors... picture-perfect.

It was a much underrated show, acting-wise.

Date: 2011-10-04 01:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] humphreycobbler.livejournal.com
I think the original Kirk was a womanizer because he was emotionally needy, always looking for a human being that could return the unconditional love he gave the Enterprise. The new one in the movie is just a player and is really too self-absorbed for a command.

Date: 2011-10-04 01:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davesmusictank.livejournal.com
I would agrre here with the Shatner Years. I found McCoy, Scottie and Spock a wonderful springboard for Kirk.

Date: 2011-10-04 03:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
Shatner had the toughest job on the show. Spock and McCoy are juicy character parts- a gift to any actor- but Kirk is just the hero and heroes are bland. There's nothing in the writing to distinguish Kirk from all the other the two-fisted TV hunks, but Shatner with his quirks and hamminess succeeded in making him not only interesting, but iconic.

Date: 2011-10-04 03:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
Yes, that's right. Thanks to Shatner the original Kirk is a fully rounded character.

Date: 2011-10-04 03:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
Those actors sparked off one another. They were a great ensemble.

Date: 2011-10-05 07:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ibid.livejournal.com
I actually think DS9 was the best of the franchise. It was so character based.

Date: 2011-10-05 08:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
I loved Quark and Odo and Major Kira. These were people you came to care about.

Date: 2011-10-05 12:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] michaleen.livejournal.com
Thanks for that: I thought I was the only one that liked Bakula.

Date: 2011-10-05 12:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] michaleen.livejournal.com
I will credit Shatner, but grudgingly, and I still found his death scene satisfying.

Also, I think this graphic sums up Kirk's character rather nicely, for good and ill.

Date: 2011-10-05 12:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] michaleen.livejournal.com
Really? I like Enterprise and never could get into Voyager.

Date: 2011-10-05 12:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
I found Enterprise dreary. Voyager had a lot of characters who were dull (Ensign Kim) and one that was toe-curlingly annoying (Neelix)

Date: 2011-10-05 12:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] halfmoon-mollie.livejournal.com
my mom liked him too. That was a good show, and if the networks hadn't moved it around so much perhaps it would still be running.

Date: 2011-10-06 11:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] michaleen.livejournal.com
I'm an odd one. I rather liked the dreariness. It seemed more realistic than the flying office building that was ST:TNG.

Date: 2011-10-06 11:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] michaleen.livejournal.com
Agreed. I felt it had just got its legs under it when they pulled the plug.

Profile

poliphilo: (Default)
poliphilo

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 23
4 5 6 7 8 910
1112 13 14 15 16 17
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jan. 18th, 2026 07:18 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios